President Trump’s election integrity efforts scored a big win at the Supreme Court!
 
In March, the president issued an executive order instructing the Post Office to work with the Social Security Administration and the Department of Homeland Security to ensure that mail-in ballots were delivered to U.S. citizens only. California and other Democrat-led states sued to block the president’s order, which is revealing by itself.
 
A left-wing federal judge appointed by Barack Obama issued an injunction blocking the president’s order. But in a 6 to 3 decision, the conservative justices lifted the lower court’s injunction, ruling that the Democrat states lacked “standing” to sue.
 
In order to have standing, the party bringing the case must have suffered real harm. Because the president’s order had not yet been implemented, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority determined that the Democrat states had not yet suffered any harm.
 
To be clear, they did not rule on the legal merits of the order itself. As to the constitutionality of how the order is ultimately enforced, the justices wrote, “On that score, time will tell.”
 
Nevertheless, this is a major victory, and we can thank President Trump’s tireless efforts to restore confidence in our voting systems. He is not the one undermining confidence in our elections. Democrats are undermining confidence in our elections by resisting every commonsense idea, including voter ID and proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote.
 
While I applaud the president’s efforts, it seems like the execution of his executive order could be a challenge. But these efforts could prevent some leftists from even trying to cheat out of fear that they could be caught and sent to jail.
 
 
 
Left-wing Racism
 
Yesterday we told you how Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed viciously attacked Vice President Vance’s grandfather and his wife, Usha. Vance blasted Michigan’s Democrat Senate nominee for saying that criticism of Sharia law is based in “White supremacy.” Vance also said that his papaw would not recognize today’s Democrat Party.
 
El-Sayed lashed out, saying Vance wouldn’t take Usha to meet his grandfather because “papaw is a racist.” It wasn’t the first time El-Sayed has attacked Usha Vance. He mocked her and J.D. for their “Brown kids” and suggested Usha was disgusted by the idea of having to sleep with her husband every night.
 
Sadly, these racist smears are typical of the “tolerant” and “progressive” Left.
 
The Associated Press implied that Usha’s “Hindu identity” would be a “liability” to the Trump/Vance campaign in 2024. Because obviously the GOP’s White Christian base is a bunch of bigots. Wrong!
 
MS NOW host Jen Psaki suggested that Usha was in an abusive relationship and needed “saving” from her husband. Leftist media outlets and columnists have insinuated that Usha is a “villain” for using her “Brown skin” to “launder the GOP’s racism.”
 
The carping hags of “The View” claimed that the only reason Usha, as a minority woman, tolerated her husband’s conservative views is because she is “addicted to power.”
 
The modern Left has a racialist ideology — it sees everything through the prism of race. They viciously attack any minority who looks at human beings for who they are and not just the color of their skin.
 
The “progressive” position used to be that there’s nothing wrong with interracial marriage. It was bigots who thought the idea was “outrageous.” But now some so-called “progressives” say that minority men or women involved in interracial marriages are “race traitors.”
 
It’s sick, and people need to understand how evil it is.
 
 
 
Speaking Of Smears. . .
 
Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed was finally forced to put some distance between himself and his chief cheerleader, antisemitic influencer Hasan Piker. On his podcast last week, Piker said that American Jews who support Israel were “making antisemitism worse.”
 
“I don’t know how people don’t recognize how dangerous this predicament is, how dangerous this is for Jews,” Piker said. He added that Israel “inevitably will be seen as basically Jewish ISIS,” and pro-Israel Jews were inviting violence against themselves.
 
Presumably, Piker also believes that pro-Israel Christians are just asking to be punched in the face for supporting the only democracy in the Middle East.
 
Reacting to Piker’s vile comments, El-Sayed released a statement saying nobody speaks for his campaign except him and his staff. But he didn’t mention Piker by name. Nor did he specifically condemn Piker’s threat of violence against Jews.
 
Comparing the democratic state of Israel to a terrorist organization is disgusting. But just imagine the media’s outrage if any conservative commentator suggested that pro-Hamas Muslims — like the ones we saw occupying our college campuses a couple of years ago — were inviting violence against themselves.
 
 
 
Dangerous Democrat Demagoguery
 
Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed was on Jesse Watters’s Fox News show Monday night. He demonstrated that he may be the most troubling and dangerous candidate who could win a seat in the United States Senate this year. His political and rhetorical skills are extraordinarily sharp. Here’s an example.
 
When Watters asked about the controversy surrounding transgender ideology, El-Sayed immediately transitioned to the rhetoric of the abortion movement. He said it’s a healthcare decision to be made by parents and their doctors, and the government shouldn’t have anything to do with it.
 
In other words, he made an “anti-government, libertarian” argument for mutilating children. But here’s where his argument falls apart.
 
First of all, El-Sayed doesn’t even believe the libertarian argument he’s making. He supports government-run, socialized healthcare. If he has his way, the government will be dictating and rationing your healthcare choices, regardless of what you and your doctor think is best.
 
Second, it’s not “gender-affirming healthcare.” That is a twisted, diabolical euphemism. There is nothing “affirming” about it. It’s radical gender-denying and reality-denying experimentation.
 
Third, this has nothing to do with “healthcare.” There is no medical reason to cut healthy body parts off of children. There is no disease that requires such extreme actions.
 
Finally, it is medical malpractice, and the government does get involved in preventing that. It’s also child abuse, and the government does get involved in preventing that.
 
 
 
Sabotaging Racial Reconciliation
 
El-Sayed also made it clear during the Watters interview that he supports reparations for slavery. That means he wants people who never owned slaves to give money to people who never were slaves in order to compensate them for something that happened over 160 years ago.
 
In what world does that make legal or moral sense? Of course, it doesn’t. But it is virtually guaranteed to set race relations in America back for decades.
 
Where do you draw the line? It would be insane to tell struggling low-income White families to give money to successful, professional Black families. Do super-rich billionaires like Oprah Winfrey, Michael Jordan, LeBron James and Tiger Woods get reparations? Do the ancestors of European immigrants who came to America after the Civil War owe payments to Black Americans?
 
It is hard to come up with something else that would drive racial animosity more than the concept of reparations.
 
In contrast, the new Trump Accounts will give all families with young children a head start on saving for their child’s future. This will particularly help lower-income, single-parent families. But some so-called “civil rights leaders” are telling families not to set up those accounts because “It was Trump’s idea.”
 
 
 
Non-Binary Nonsense
 
In breaking news, the WNBA’s Toronto Tempo just unveiled a new mascot.
 
The Tempo proudly announced that “Dez,” a Borealis Blue Snapping Turtle, is non-binary. Why would the WNBA brag about a mascot not identifying as a woman? I have no idea. But I agree with Greg Gutfeld, who said “Dez” looks like someone you’d tell your children to stay away from.