More News of Concern on the Environment and Man-Made Climate Change
The results of a new peer-reviewed Organization Studies survey are out, published in a Forbes article. Founded in 1993, the Organization Studies Research Network’s website explains that it “comes together around a common concern for, and a shared interest to explore, new possibilities in knowledge, culture and change management, within the broader context of the nature and future of organizations and their impact on modern society.”
The survey polled 1,077 geoscientists to find the current thinking of this large group on how human activities are affecting our climate.
The largest subgroup of participants fit the “Comply with Kyoto” model. This subgroup of 36% of participants expressed the strong belief that climate change is happening and is not a normal cycle of nature, and humans are the main cause. This result will not surprise the man-made climate change faction among us.
The next largest subgroup is the “Nature is Overwhelming” faction, at 24%. These scientists believe that changes to the climate are natural and normal, but they strongly disagree that climate change poses any significant public risk and see no impact on their personal lives.
Those two groups, however, represent only 60% of the total.
Following at 17% in third place are the “Fatalists.” They credit both human and natural causes for climate change; consider climate change to be a smaller public risk with little impact on their personal lives; are skeptical that the scientific debate is settled regarding the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) modeling; and think climate change is but a small risk. They are said to hold the position, “How can anyone take action if research is biased,” the report notes.
Coming in fourth are those in the “Economic Responsibility” model at 10% of participants. These Earth scientists “diagnose climate change as being natural or human caused,” but more than any other group hold to the idea that the real cause of climate change is unknown, as nature is forever changing and therefore uncontrollable. They also are unlikely to accept that scientific debate is settled.
The smallest subgroup is the “Regulation Activists,” which, at just 5% of the total, are skeptical that the scientific debate is settled and also blame both natural and human causes.
These findings prompted the author of the Forbes article, James Taylor, to conclude: “Taken together, these four skeptical groups numerically blow away the 36 percent of scientists who believe global warming is human caused and a serious concern.”
Taylor adds, “Now that we have access to hard surveys of scientists themselves, it is becoming clear that not only do many scientists dispute the asserted global warming crisis, but these skeptical scientists may indeed form a scientific consensus.”
These findings should not surprise those who have followed this debate and who do not automatically subscribe to the idea that fossil-fuel use is causing climate change.
“Climate change itself is already in the process of definitively rebutting climate alarmists who think human use of fossil fuels is causing ultimately catastrophic global warming,” wrote Peter Ferrara of the Heartland Institute back in 2012, discussing the seventh International Climate Change Conference.
“That is because natural climate cycles have already turned from warming to cooling, global temperatures have already been declining for more than 10 years, and global temperatures will continue to decline for another two decades or more,” Ferrara continued.
He called attention to the fact that temperatures dropped steadily from the late 1940s to the late 1970s. The popular press even predicted a coming ice age. Ice ages have cyclically occurred roughly every 10,000 years, with a new one actually due around now, Ferrara wrote.
He writes about Don Easterbrook, Professor Emeritus of Geology at Western Washington University, who “publicly predicted in 2000 that global temperatures would decline by 2010. He made that prediction because he knew the Pacific Decadal Oscillation had turned cold in 1999, something the political scientists at the UN’s IPCC did not know or did not think significant.”
Easterbrook was correct, and the IPCC was wrong, Ferrara notes. And 56% of the Earth scientists surveyed say that natural causes are a significant factor and perhaps a more significant factor than fossil-fuel use.
Using fossil fuels will naturally give way to other methods when those methods are able to provide the needed energy economically and without drastic disruption.
Until then, we need to stop the climate alarmism and focus on actual problems, like drug addiction, the national debt, and illegal immigration.