Canada Goes Tow to Tow With Truckers
The most important part of this protest isn’t who’s funding it or where it’s happening.
They blasted their horns and sang “O Canada!” Some of the protestors linked arms as Ottawa police moved through the 300 semis and campers, arresting people along the way. Others locked themselves in their cars or defiantly rolled canisters of diesel down the blockade. But that was the extent of the “backlash.” When officers started cracking down on the Freedom Convoy Friday morning, there were no Molotov cocktails. The truckers didn’t torch government buildings or throw fireworks at mounted police. Ever since the demonstration started, they’ve been composed, peaceful. And the American Left can’t stand it.
South of the Canadian border, if it’s not on fire – it’s not a protest. That’s what Democrats and their anarchist friends have taught us since George Floyd’s death sparked a nationwide mob in 2020. After more than a year of looting, vandalizing, arson, and general domestic terror, what the Canadians have managed to accomplish is almost unrecognizable to the U.S. Left. To the rest of America, it’s a refreshing reminder of the kind of civil disobedience this nation used to embrace for change. It’s a peaceful protest, Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) told the Daily Signal, “clog things up, make them think about the [vaccine] mandates.”
In American cities, for months, there was no time to think about anything. People were too busy reaching for fire extinguishers, barricading their doors and boarding up their buildings like we were forced to do here in the nation’s capital. So it’s no wonder that the majority of people in this country applaud the truckers in Canada for showing the world how effective nonviolent disruptions can be.
But not everyone is lining up to cheer the shift in strategy. Democrats, still stinging from the blame heaped on them for the riots, are trying to turn the tables on Republicans. “Some see racist double standards,” the Associated Press insists. Conservatives who praise the truckers, Corey Williams and Sara Burnett argued, are hypocrites. It’s “two-faced,” one Boston University professor told them, for supporting a “white, conservative rights movement,” but “when you have Black Lives Matter protestors on the street (they) are ‘thugs’ (who) scare you.”
First of all, the mandate pushback has nothing to do with race. That’s a convenient, worn-out line from a party that’s gotten too lazy to make sound arguments. If anything, the opposition to mandates like Joe Biden’s is so universal it’s actually unifying. Fifty-nine percent of Americans support the convoy’s crusade, a new Rasmussen Report announces – including 42 percent who “strongly support” it. Oh, and in case the AP was wondering, that includes “majorities of every racial category – 55 percent of whites, 55 percent of black voters, and 70 percent of other minorities.” And, not to rub it in, but their enthusiasm also applies to “similar protests in the United States” with an even bigger African-American majority: 52 percent of whites, 55 percent of black voters and 64 percent of other minorities.
Secondly, the AP is comparing apples to oranges – or, in this case, blockades to firebombs. As Paul pointed out, “there’s a stark contrast between civil disobedience – which has been a time-honored tradition in our country – and burning down buildings, looting businesses, and violently attacking actual peaceful protestors and innocent bystanders.” No one, Senator Ted Cruz’s (R-Texas) office agreed, has a right to “assault another person, loot and [destroy] buildings – those actions are not exercising a constitutional right, no matter what the circumstance.
Of course, this line of partisan attack is nothing new for the AP, who had the nerve to call state election reform a "slow-motion insurrection” last month. Like the other Democratic operations masquerading as news outlets, the AP never misses a chance to throw in a reference or two about January 6, like an ace it’s been hiding up its sleeve. And they didn’t disappoint this time, flushing more of its journalistic cred down the tubes by suggesting “a racist double standard” is exactly what we should expect from a conservative movement responsible for the Capitol riot.
But then, what should we expect from the radical media – who, we’ve come to find out, is actually helping Canada dox its own people? While Justin Trudeau’s regime moves to freeze the truckers’ bank accounts, his justice minister, David Lametti has been warning since Wednesday that the government is going to also target anyone who’s contributed money to the convoy. “If you are a member of a pro-Trump movement who’s donating… you ought to be worried,” he threatened.
Enter the Washington Post, who managed to get their hands on some leaked donor info, and started contacting supporters demanding to know why they’d give to the convoy. Their smear game was so repulsive that even radical Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) weighed in. “I fail to see why any journalist felt the need to report on a shop owner making such a[n] insignificant donation rather than to get them harassed,” Omar wrote. “It’s unconscionable and journalists need to do better.” Cruz, in what has to be a first, retweeted her in agreement, saying he did so “unironically.” “When you’ve lost even Ilhan Omar,” followers pointed out, “you know that the media and other prominent doxxers have gone too far.”
At the end of the day, the most important part of this protest isn’t who’s funding it or where it’s happening – it’s the motivation behind it: personal freedom. No one in a civilized society – least of all Canada or America – should want to violate the rights of conscience, FRC’s Owen Strachan argued. “I wouldn’t want to do that as an American citizen, even if I’m not a Christian – because the rights of conscience are not like 37th on the list of important factors in a free society, the rights of conscience are basically first. If you take those away, you no longer have a free society.”
As more North American leaders are exposed as tyrants, he said, let’s all be in prayer that some good – some genuine good – comes from this. Hopefully, one day soon, the freedoms that our country’s very first protestors fought for will find their way back into the government’s respect.
Originally published here.
GOP Tries to Put Masks on the No-Fly List
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (Republican) is hoping to permanently ground the federal aviation mask mandate with a lawsuit filed Wednesday. “The argument is pretty simple,” he said. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “didn’t have the authority to issue these mask mandates for transportation hubs and commercial airlines…. There was no statutory authority from Congress, and certainly there was no authority to say that they were going to potentially impose criminal penalties – which they do, if you listen to them, on every flight.” To make it “some type of criminal felony,” he argued, “Congress would have had to pass that.”
He filed the lawsuit with Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF) on behalf of frequent flier Congresswoman Beth Van Duyne (R-Texas). “It was not authorized by Congress, and the CDC did not put the mandate up for notice and comment, which is ordinarily required for regulations like this,” said the AG’s office. The bottom line is this: the CDC exceeded their authority in mandating all airline passengers don masks.
The Biden administration’s CDC has flown off course before. In September of last year, the Supreme Court struck down the CDC’s eviction moratorium, arguing, “It would be one thing if Congress had specifically authorized the action that the CDC has taken. But that has not happened.” The CDC’s “reliance on a decades-old statute… strains credulity,” the Court said. In other words, even the Supreme Court couldn’t believe they did what they did.
Now, if you’re like me, you’re probably wondering what business “The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention” has regulating housing or air travel in the first place. Good question. Unless freedom has now become a communicable disease, you’re more likely to find an infected bat in Wuhan than a reasonable explanation.
But the emperor’s new birthday suit hasn’t deterred the CDC from taping an ineffective cloth mask to his face. According to the Federal Aviation Administration, since the beginning of 2021, 70 percent (about 4,500) of complaints regarding unruly airline passengers involved the passengers not wearing masks. Those passengers are getting thrown off flights and put on no-fly lists simply for resenting unelected bureaucrats trampling on their freedoms without the slightest shade of legality. Not only are these American citizens denied the presumption of innocence, but they are being treated the same as terrorists without even being charged with violating any federal law.
The silliest part of this charade is that airlines have never been a major spreader for COVID, despite the close quarters. The CDC itself defines “close contact” as “a cumulative total of 15 minutes or more” within six feet. But most commercial aircraft replace the cabin air every 2 to 3 minutes. That air circulation greatly reduces the risk of the infection taking off.
With TPPF filing for a preliminary injunction, Paxton hoped for “a very quick resolution,” although “it depends on the court… how long it takes the judge to rule.” For their part, the CDC is delaying any rule change, although it may try to pull out of a nosedive by letting the mandate expire. But Paxton said, “if they drop out of the lawsuit knowing they’re going to lose… they leave themselves in place to do this in the future. We can’t have that.” He added, “we’ve got to get some type of ruling from a court that creates precedent.” Good for the Texas AG to hold their feet to the fire.
Originally published here.
This is a publication of the Family Research Council. Mr. Perkins is president of FRC.
