Dana Milbank holds the hatchet in the Washington Post’s newsroom for his hack job of a column about a Heritage Foundation panel on the Benghazi attack. When a hijab-wearing law student asked a question “in a soft voice” about peaceful Muslims in the face of radical Islam, Milbank’s article said the panelists “pounced,” “demanded,” “grinned and joined in the assault.” If this were true, we would decry the discrimination. But as The Federalist’s MZ Hemmingway wrote, “Dana Milbank is a columnist for the Washington Post who serially exaggerates or distorts what he writes about. It’s just what he does. This has been established so many times by so many people that it’s disappointing to see he is still given prominent perch in his paper and that people who made it past their sophomore year in high school take him seriously.” More…