Louis DeBroux / January 10, 2018

Lawsuit Exposes Google as Intolerant and Vindictive

It’s targeting conservative and white male employees simply because of their appearance and beliefs.

Conservative icon William F. Buckley once said, “Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.” Today’s “liberals” are not only offended to discover other viewpoints; they actively seek to crush them. There is no room in modern progressivism for disagreement when it comes to enforcing the leftist worldview, and that jihad against free thought is manifest most clearly in the leftist strongholds of academia, the media and Silicon Valley technology giants.

Though claiming to be champions of diversity, Silicon Valley tech giants are anything but. Mozilla fired its founder for donating $1,000 to a pro-marriage campaign a decade ago. Video-streaming giant YouTube (owned by Google) censors videos from Prager University and other conservative commentators, and Facebook and Twitter routinely censor content. Google also has added a new feature: a sidebar called “Reviewed Claims” that only seems to show up when searching conservative news sites.

Now tech giant Google finds itself the subject of a lawsuit for discriminatory practices, targeting conservative and white male employees for harassment and mistreatment simply because of their appearance and beliefs.

Last summer, Google made headlines for firing senior software engineer James Damore who, according to his performance reviews, was a stellar employee with a bright future.

So what egregious sin got him fired and made Google executives turn him into a pariah? He dared utter the biologically indisputable truth that men and women are different; anatomically, intellectually and in their career preferences and life goals. His memo, entitled “Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber,” not only called the company’s “diversity” initiatives into question, but argued that “differences in distributions of traits may in part explain why we don’t have 50 percent representation of women in tech.”

Damore’s lawsuit asserts he and others at Google were “ostracized, belittled, and punished for their heterodox political views, and for the added sin of their birth circumstances of being Caucasians and/or males. … This is the essence of discrimination — Google formed opinions about and then treated Plaintiffs not based on their individual merits, but rather on their membership in groups with assumed characteristics.”

The lawsuit includes a wealth of internal memos and emails revealing that rather than being a bastion of diversity, Google more closely resembles Soviet Russia, where blasphemy against the religion of the state was punished swiftly and harshly.

White males are particularly singled out for contempt, as evidenced by the fact that Google managers created “blacklists” of conservative employees that they refused to work with. There was also a meme posted internally claiming if Google wanted to increase diversity it should “fire all of the bigoted white men.”

Google reflects a sort of mob mentality against conservatives specifically. As reported in The Guardian, internal Google memos show employee support for aggressive intolerance against Damore and any who share his views, demanding Google respond to Damore’s memo by “disciplining or terminating those who have expressed support.” One manager went so far as to post his efforts to “silence” certain “violently offensive” perspectives, writing, “There are certain ‘alternative views, including different political views’ which I do not want people to feel safe to share here. … You can believe that women or minorities are unqualified all you like … but if you say it out loud, then you deserve what’s coming to you.”

Damore’s lawsuit also includes a mass email from one of Google’s directors in which he called Damore’s (scientifically accurate) email “repulsive and intellectually dishonest,” and an email from another engineer warned him, “I will keep hounding you until one of us is fired.”

Rachel Whetstone, formerly senior VP of communications and public policy for Google before being recruited by Uber, expressed her concerns over this strictly enforced groupthink at Google, stating, “It seems like we believe in free expression except when people disagree with the majority view. … I have lost count of the times at Google, for example, people tell me privately that they cannot admit their voting choice if they are Republican because they fear how other Googlers react.”

Other examples of such intolerance include Google’s refusal to allow internal mailing lists for conservatives while supporting such lists for those interested in polygamy, transgenderism, and “furries” (people who like to dress up in animal costumes, often for sexual gratification).

When Damore’s firing became national news, Danielle Brown, the ironically titled vice president for diversity, integrity and governance, stated, “We are unequivocal in our belief that diversity and inclusion are critical to our success as a company. We’ll continue to stand for that and be committed to it for the long haul.”

Unless, of course, you are a white male with conservative political views, in which case you should be made a public example; attacked, vilified, excoriated, driven from polite company, and stripped of your livelihood.

Because tolerance.

It might also interest the reader to discover that Google, this bastion of diversity and tolerance, is not only being sued for creating a hostile work environment for white males and conservatives, it is being sued for “extreme pay discrimination” against female workers following a three-year investigation by the Labor Department.

So there’s that.

British historian Alan Bullock wrote of Soviet dictator Josef Stalin’s mastery of propaganda, explaining that “the true object of propaganda is neither to convince nor even to persuade, but to produce a uniform pattern of public utterance in which the first trace of unorthodox thought immediately reveals itself as a jarring dissonance.”

It looks like Google has learned that lesson well.

Start a conversation using these share links:

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!


“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2022 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.