Columnist.
Law-abiding Americans have no obligation to take ownership of a madman's actions.
Media outlets have further obfuscated the issue to protect Democrats. It is perhaps most obvious in the questions they ask.
Republicans might want to ask their Democrat colleagues what, if any, limitations on abortion they believe should be instituted.
It is by any liberal ideal of open discourse preferable to allow lies to seep into the information stream than to allow a panel nomenklatura to start dictating the veracity of what we read and hear.
Presidents should make fewer promises and act with more modesty.
Most voters will surely recall that inflation concerns predated the invasion of Ukraine.
Colorado's new law makes eugenic arguments about the "social, moral, and economic benefits" of not having children.
He must recuse from making any foreign policy decisions for the sake of democracy.
The debate is about who gets to make that decision: parents or administrators?
Every plan to fight climate change either creates fabricated markets to raise prices on fossil fuels or creates artificial scarcity.
Progressives believe that it's bullying to ask kids not to wear masks, but it's not bullying for the state to coerce them to do it.
It's no surprise that Putin thinks this is the time to strike.
This is what the hysterics surrounding the specter of "dark money" is all about.
The administration ignored warnings because it believed leaving Afghanistan would be a political slam dunk.
You can only expect people to live under two sets of rules and standards for so long.
Allowing the state to participate sets a dangerous precedent that can be easily abused by those in power.
Hillary Clinton claimed that Trump was an "illegitimate" president on numerous occasions, later advising Biden not to concede under any circumstances in a close race.
Stymied, the president has decided to preemptively undermine confidence in the 2022 and 2024 elections.
He rationalizes his assaults on norms by pretending the nation faces an existential threat to "democracy."
People who claim to be guardians of "democracy" argue that a senator owes his loyalty to his party over his state.
