
Columnist.
Honoring the sacrifice that made America
This time, spending cuts and tax reform should be part of the deal
Under Obama, rules have fallen out of balance
States' shortsighted cash grab will cost everyone
It's not amnesty, we're told. Oh, no. Yet the immigration bill that was recently introduced in the U.S. Senate would give legal residency to the estimated 11 million people who are here illegally. News flash: That's amnesty. The bill's supporters may be motivated by a desire to create a clean slate. Just accept those who have already made their way here, they're saying in effect. We'll crack down on the borders and make sure this flow stops. Yes, sir we'll lay down the law. This time we mean business.
When educators compete, students win
The U.S. is still vulnerable to an electromagnetic catastrophe
Free-market ideas can help Detroit make a comeback
OK, Obamacare. Up on the table. It's time for your annual physical. Three years old, eh? Well, with any luck, you'll leave here with a clean bill of uh-oh. I can see one problem already. Have you seen these tax hikes? Let's see -- five, 10, 15, 18 tax hikes in all. That hardly seems wise, considering the fragile health of the economy, but there they are. There's the tax on individuals who don't purchase health insurance. That will cost $55 billion over the next decade. I also see a 40 percent excise tax on "Cadillac" health plans costing more than $10,200 for individuals and $27,500 for families. It'll be $111 billion for that between 2018 and 2022. Several smaller ones, such as limiting the amount people can set aside in their flexible spending accounts: $4.5 billion there from 2011 to 2022.
Say you're running a business, and you find yourself awash in red ink. You realize it's time to retool your approach, and fast. So you ask two different employees each to come up with a budget. You'll go with whoever writes the best plan. What are the chances that one of them will submit a budget that never puts you in the black? One that suggests you raise prices and spend still more money? Practically nil. Yet that's exactly what the Senate expects the federal government to do. Its recent budget proposal doesn't even attempt to restore balance. Spending would go up right away. So would taxes, and it doesn't even touch entitlement programs such as Medicaid -- which, along with interest on the debt, will take up all tax revenues by 2025, when today's kindergarteners go off to college.
Robust missile defense renders nuclear arms race futile
Dire predictions about the fate of certain government programs hardly have been in short supply as sequestration-related budget cuts loomed. It was hardly a surprise, then, when Education Secretary Arne Duncan got in on the act. "It just means a lot more children will not get the kinds of services and opportunities they need, and as many as 40,000 teachers could lose their jobs," he said in an interview with CBS' "Face the Nation." "There are literally teachers now who are getting pink slips, who are getting notices that they can't come back this fall." It turns out, though, that it isn't true. Glenn Kessler at The Washington Post confirmed this in a fact-check column that awarded Mr. Duncan no fewer than four "Pinocchios" for this whopper.
"Sequester." It's a word that used to come up rarely. It nearly always referred to a jury being locked away to deliberate a verdict. Now it's all over the news, a stand-in for the automatic spending cuts scheduled to hit the federal budget Friday. The only jury is an American public that has grown all too accustomed to seeing politicians dodge the tough choices necessary to bring spending under control. "There will be no easy offramps on this one," one senior statesman said as he defended sequestration in November 2011. "We need to keep the pressure up to compromise, not turn off the pressure. The only way these spending cuts will not take place is if Congress gets back to work and agrees on a balanced plan to reduce the deficit by at least $1.2 trillion. That's exactly what they need to do. That's the job they promised to do, and they've still got a year to at least figure it out."
Natural gas is the key to a bountiful future
With perseverance, every obstacle can be overcome
A bipartisan effort is under way to overhaul the nation's immigration system, improve border security and provide a path to citizenship for those here illegally. Stop me if you've heard this one before. Those of us who have been in Washington for a while certainly have. The plan announced recently by a group of senators dubbed the "Gang of Eight" may be touted as a new and novel approach. But it sounds eerily familiar to the one enacted in 1986. At that time, greater border security and better enforcement of our laws governing immigration was promised in exchange for granting citizenship to illegal immigrants.
School choice raises student achievement
How taxing the rich leaves everyone poorer
"Land of the free." It's right there in our national anthem. As well it should be -- the personal liberties we enjoy are the envy of many around the world. Freedom is no accident. It requires constant vigilance. It takes economic liberty, an area where the United States has begun to slip quite a bit lately. How would you say the United States compares to other nations? There's no need to guess. We can pinpoint it exactly by using an annual guide known as the Index of Economic Freedom. Top three, you think? Top five? Nope. Last year at this time came the news that the United States had dropped to 10th place. Now, the 2013 index is out, and we can see that the United States hasn't budged from that spot.
Japan and South Korea steer right