
Columnist.
Every allegation in the lawsuit is based on the patronizing view that Black and other minority voters are somehow not as capable as other voters of dealing with election rules and procedures.
At a hearing Tuesday intended to build support for HR 4, Maureen Riordan did the exact opposite
Until legislators pass these sensible measures, elections in that state will be anything but strong and secure.
Every allegation in the lawsuit is based on the patronizing view that minority voters are not as capable of dealing with election rules and procedures.
With little to no evidence of actual voting discrimination, his partisan public relations ploy would simply be a waste of taxpayer money.
HR 4 is an anti-democratic federal power grab designed to thwart election reform and manipulate redistricting decisions.
Harris made that false claim about "voter suppression" in September last year when she was running for office.

Congressional representation in the House is a zero-sum game. When one state gains representation, another state loses it.
He should do what is best for West Virginians — and the rest of the American public.
America already has a problem with illegal immigrants registering and voting.
For West Virginia, this election reform bill is a good start on fixing some of the vulnerabilities in its election process.

Critics don't seem to have actually read the Georgia bill or understand that similar provisions already exist in federal law.
Who should be outraged by HR 1 and this redistricting scheme? Answer: every American.
We bet that most people would think that "rolling back access to voting" by dead people is probably a good idea.
The biggest newspaper in the nation's capital was forced to admit that it "misquoted" the president.
Legislators have proposed several amendments to the state's election code relating to primaries and elections.
The voting procedures resemble the plot of the 1999 Reese Witherspoon movie "Election."
This is a reminder that lawyers have obligatory ethical and professional obligations with which they must comply.
It would not only eliminate basic safety protocols, but mandate new, reckless rules and procedures.
If H.R. 1 is not stopped, then Americans may never be able to trust the fairness and credibility of future election outcomes.