
Columnist.
It doesn't seem completely inappropriate for the 47th president to have the seventh president's portrait on the wall.
If that success continues — a big "if" — Trump could establish an enduring political template.
"We've reached a point where there's just too many mistakes and too much censorship."
Even if turnabout is fair play, at some point, enough is enough.

His current dominance owes something to the man's uncanny persistence and shrewd insight.
In Marc Andreessen's view, the Democrats who claim to be the great scourge of "disinformation" are threatening to embed disinformation in the bedrock of society.
What happened to the Democrats as the party promising economic redistribution from the rich to the average man?
It is, as the headline on an Ezra Klein postelection Times interview proclaims, "the end of the Obama coalition."
It's hard to find a time when a party's leadership was so far along in years.

Trump's percentage rose in every state in the country, something that doesn't always happen in a rematch or quasi-rematch.
It's unwise to be confident that your candidate has made their last mistake or that the opposition's last mistake will surely be decisive.
Trump supporters have been all smiles, while Trump opponents have been bristling with rage.

About half of minorities, like half of whites, say big-city crime is out of control.
Have the vibes run out for Harris? Seems like a fair question.
I can see two reasons why this debate may have some significant effect.
There are signs that Team Harris may be nervous about the risks in their strategy.
What we have now is Harris and Trump advancing crass campaign promises that lack seriousness.
"If she isn't able to move the needle in the polls at least a little bit, maybe that means the country just isn't buying what she's selling."