Columnist.
"I have a really hard time believing this."
CNN loves to call Trump a "convicted felon," and now they are "convicted defamers."
The Republican half of America is routinely abused and shafted by "public" radio and TV networks they are forced to subsidize.
Journalism professors love to disdain being "stenographers to power," but that's what these networks have been for Biden.
Meyers mocked Trump with 2,736 jokes to just 292 for Joe Biden, and 13 for Kamala Harris.
America in 1980 was mired in inflation and a hostage crisis and the Soviet Union expanded into Afghanistan. But now we should pretend Carter didn't project weakness?
You can tell who favors censorship by noticing who is upset.
The abnormal people here are the anti-Trump ranters who can't seem to fathom that every president tries to "tone down adversarial coverage."
What Matthew Graves has failed to do is prosecute actual criminals in the nation's capital.
The American electorate rejected Biden's policies at the polls. The distraught Democrat reporters would rather forget that happened.
Everyone knew the president was babbling and bumbling.
PolitiFact clearly hates the spin that mass importation is a serious problem that should be solved with mass deportation.
Both the Democrats and their media enablers can't imagine that people see them as the ones who are the Freeze Police of the chilling effect.
The First Amendment doesn't automatically grant sainthood to the press.
Journalists have never cared about the costs of these programs because they support them, so why ask skeptical questions about it?
This, in political terms, is a kangaroo court, where the accused is not allowed to know his accusers — "for fear of retaliation."
No one's surprised that Joe Biden would commit this outrage and then fly to Africa to get out of the earshot of reporters. His entire presidency seemed designed to avoid reporters, and never mind that about 95% of them are Biden voters.
Ever since Watergate, the media's coverage of scandals has underlined the most egregious double standards in political coverage.
If "smart" journalists want to figure out the election results, they can't conclude that every media criticism is a lie.
We can say with confidence that the big media don't have the same grip on public opinion that they have long imagined.
