Greetings everyone. Well, Marxist leftist heads are about to explode because it is believed that the U.S. Supreme Court will rule against Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). This section requires racial consideration when redistricting. The SCOTUS has heard arguments in the case of Louisiana v. Callais, which stems from actions taken back in 2022.

Originally, legislators in the Bayou State passed a congressional map that lowered the number of CVAP (citizen voting age-population), meaning a majority is of a single racial minority from 2 to 1. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the map violated the VRA and forced the legislature to redraw a second black-majority district.

Racial Redistricting?

At question here is a simple issue: should redistricting be “blind to race?” Redistricting based upon partisan grounds is constitutional. Don’t believe me? Just look at all these Blue States, like Massachusetts and Illinois.

This is an interesting topic because of the congressional redistricting that has just happened here in Texas. And of course, it was immediately challenged on legality, but the perplexing aspect is that Marxist leftists are accusing Republicans in Texas of redistricting based on racism. It was telling when those testifying or defending the leftist opposition asked Republican legislators if they considered “race” in the redistricting process. The answer is no, it was done on partisan grounds, which is constitutional, and a well-used practice by the leftists.

So, if I am understanding this case correctly, it’s racist when you do not give special considerations for Blacks. But, is it not racist to give special considerations to Blacks at the expense of other racial groups?

I think this is why we saw members of the Asian community bring lawsuits and win, challenging the whole affirmative action policy, which pushed standards and qualifications aside for the purpose of racial discrimination. I mean, do we have affirmative action in college football, or do we assess the best and most qualified to get scholarships or big-time NIL deals?

True Colors

The case before the SCOTUS is the result of a group of Louisiana voters who challenged the redrawn congressional map with two CVAPs as unconstitutional racial gerrymandering in violation of the 14th Amendment of the U.S.Constitution.

Now, as always, you can count upon leftists to express just how they feel, especially when a prized bull in their stable is about to get gored.

Justice Ketanji Brown-Jackson, who could not define what a woman is, compared black voters to disabled people who need special accommodations. Yep, to the Marxist leftists and their Black economic plantation gatekeepers, being black is a disability. How disingenuous. Justice Jackson stated, “Section 2 of the VRA is responding to current-day manifestations of past and present decisions that disadvantage minorities and make it so that they don’t have equal access to the voting system…they’re disabled.”

Isn’t it quite revealing how leftists see Blacks as disabled and too ignorant to be able to get a picture ID in order to vote?

Hmm, I hate to tell Justice Jackson this, but I just voted yesterday in the Texas Constitutional Amendments ballot proposals. Then again, perhaps Justice Jackson does not consider me as being Black, since the fella who appointed her to the SCOTUS once asserted that “if you don’t vote for me, you ain’t Black.” That seems to be a rather racist statement.

Not to be outdone, Justice Sonia Sotomayor once again gave evidence as to why she should retire. She stated, “Even white Democrats won’t vote for black candidates” as a justification to protect black-majority districts. Well, Justice Sonia, I was elected to Congress in a congressional district that was 92% white, had a large Jewish population, and had the highest per capita income zip code in the Country. Oh yeah, Rush Limbaugh was a constituent, and Mar-a-Lago was in the district. So, what does that say about “white Democrats?” Sooo, who are the real racists? “Let’s just give da colored peeple a congressional district because ain’t nobody other than them would vote for an ignoramus like Jasmine Crockett or Ayana Pressley.”

VRA Constitutional Issues

The bottom line in this case is that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is not in alignment with the U.S. Constitution. The SCOTUS is supposed to interpret the Constitution, which is the law of the land. Leftists like saying that when it fits their narrative. Additionally, the Supremacy Clause, Article VI, Section 2, is clearly on the side of striking down Section 2 of the VRA.

The time has come to end the Marxist leftists leveraging race, especially with Blacks, all to their political gain and advantage. When these Democrats refer to others as racist, they are only projecting onto others who, and what, they truly are. As leftist President Lyndon Johnson said about Air Force One with some southern Democrat Governors, “If we can pass this civil rights act, we will have those n-word, voting for us for 200 years”. Well, we are 61 years into his diabolical plan of creating an economic plantation where the crop is no longer cotton, but votes.

I just hope that the SCOTUS is not concerned about being called names and will do what is right by interpreting the Constitution. Regardless of what folks with common sense do, the Marxist leftists will refer to you as racists, homophobes, xenophobes, islamophobes, transphobes, nazis, extremists, jack boots, Gestapo…you name it. Do what is right, and let their heads explode. Strike down Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act as it is unconstitutional.

It is racist to construct congressional representation based solely upon race.

And I don’t give a doggone if I am called a sellout, Uncle Tom, Black white supremacist, Oreo, white man’s porch monkey or any other term of disparagement and denigration. I will just pop some more popcorn as I watch your heads blow, just like in the movie Kingsman.

Steadfast and Loyal.

Republished from ACRU Action Fund.