As shocking as it was to see President Obama bow to King Abdullah in 2009, it’s been more frustrating to see him bend to the Saudis’ religious intolerance. Although Saudi Arabia continues to climb the charts of faith-based hostility, the subject was probably as absent from last week’s Camp David’s Arab talks as the King himself. While the President plows ahead with his Iran agenda, he’s missing a crucial opportunity to address the growing issue of global persecution with the countries most responsible for spreading it.

Even his own government is sounding the alarm about the explosion in Christian genocide — most recently in the annual report by the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF). With all eyes on the Middle East, USCIRF explains that ISIS is turning the region into the biggest hotspot for faith-based oppression. “Humanitarian crises fueled by waves of terror, intimidation, and violence have engulfed an alarming number of countries in the year since the release of [our] prior report last May,” the Commission explains. “The horrors of the past year speak volumes about how and why religious freedom and the protection of the rights of vulnerable religious communities matter.”

Boko Haram and ISIS continue to sweep through Africa, Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq, leaving a bloody and tear-stained trail behind. “From summary executions to forced conversations, rape to sexual enslavement, abducted children to destroyed houses of worship, attacks on these communities are part of a systematic effort to erase their presence from the Middle East.” Yet in the face of the one of the greatest human rights crises of our time, the Obama administration seems to have no interest in balancing religious liberty with its other interests.

That fact wasn’t lost on USCIRF, which admonished the President to “work toward promoting religious freedom in countries like China, Iran, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia.” America, the Commission scolds, has not prioritized religious liberty enough in foreign policy — fanning the flame of even wider abuses. Chief among its complaints is that the U.S. hasn’t blocked visas for religious rights violators. Instead, thanks to the lax attitude at the State Department, enemies of freedom continue to stream into the country, while innocent Christians like Iraqi nun Sister Diana Momeka are initially and inexplicably denied entry.

“Directly related to identifying and barring from entry severe religious freedom violators, IRFA also requires the President to determine the specific officials responsible for violations of religious freedom engaged in or tolerated by governments … and when applicable and to the extent practicable, publish the names of these officials in the Federal Register.” Among other things, the report calls on the U.S. to “train its officials, foreign service officers, and military service members and chaplains more on international religious liberty.”

And these burdens don’t have to fall on the U.S. alone. If the administration cared, it could make this a collaborative effort with countries like the U.K. and Canada. Of course, that cooperation would be a lot easier if the newly appointed Ambassador-At-Large for International Religious Liberty — a post the White House refused to fill for almost three years — had direct access to the White House or the Secretary of State as the law requires. The world can’t heed the cry for freedom if its biggest defenders are silent. All nations, USCIRF Chair Katrina Swett warned, “should care about abuses beyond their borders, not only for humanitarian reasons, but because what goes on in other nations rarely remains there. In the long run, there is only one permanent guarantor of the safety, security, and survival of the persecuted and vulnerable. It is the full recognition of religious freedom.”

Of course, we shouldn’t be surprised that the Obama administration is indifferent to religious persecution abroad when their own policies here at home have promoted religious intolerance. Certainly beheadings for your faith are not the same as being forced to violate your beliefs through government policies or laws, but they both spring from the same root of intolerance. For more on the urgency of this crisis, check out my interview with Fox News’s Shannon Bream.

Louisiana Takes Poll Position on Freedom

There’s a reason liberals are polling on the wrong question in Louisiana! If they asked voters about the actual effects of the Marriage and Conscience Act, liberals wouldn’t like what the voters had to say. Turns out, protecting the freedom of belief isn’t as controversial as the media would have you believe. In a brand new survey, commissioned by FRC and the Louisiana Family Forum Action through WPA Opinion Research, most Louisianans agree that the government shouldn’t be able to discriminate against individuals, organizations, or family businesses just for holding a natural view of marriage. Under the state’s H.B. 707, a person couldn’t lose their tax status, professional license, or state grants for believing in marriage as the union of a man and woman.

Of course, national liberal groups have tried to replicate the success they had in Indiana forcing policy makers to retreat from their defense of religious liberty. But in Louisiana, Governor Bobby Jindal ® isn’t budging. And based on these results, he’d be crazy to. Almost seven in 10 (67%) of likely voters in the Pelican State support the Marriage and Conscience Act — and 60% of them said they’d be more likely to back a legislator who did the same. Forces of political correctness, beware. This isn’t just a winning issue for religious liberty but also for the leaders who support it!

Brody Pops the Question on Marriage

Courage is contagious — and on values issues, it’s downright infectious. For the last several weeks, the GOP presidential candidates (official and unofficial) have been trying to out-conservative each other on even some of the thorniest issues of the day. From religious liberty bills to same-sex “marriage,” the tug to the right has been obvious, even for the party’s more moderate candidates. To a man (and woman), the field has lined up to defend marriage from the redefinition of activist judges.

During an interview with CBN’s “The Brody File,” Governor Jeb Bush was the latest to blast the assumption that same-sex “marriage” is a constitutional right. Calling the institution a “sacrament,” the Florida leader helped tamp down criticism about his inner circle and defended the party’s platform. “[C]learly this has been accelerated at a warp pace,” he said. “What’s interesting is four years ago, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton had the same view that I just expressed to you.” He went on, “I think traditional marriage is a sacrament,” he said. “It’s at the core of the Catholic faith, and to imagine how we are going to succeed in our country unless we have committed family life, committed child-centered family system, is hard to imagine,” Governor Bush said. “We need to be stalwart supporters of traditional marriage.”

This is a publication of the Family Research Council. Mr. Perkins is president of FRC.