Occasionally I come across a column by an author not among our esteemed syndicated writers, who has covered an issue in compelling way. And one such column on the Hamas Islamo-fascists deserves your attention.

I have written at length about Joe Biden’s catastrophic foreign policy failures, noting that tyrannical power does not tolerate a vacuum.

The first of Biden’s cascading failures was his surrender and retreat from Afghanistan, leaving the country in the hands of the same invading terrorists that hosted al-Qa'ida for its 9/11 Islamist attack on our nation. The second was, in effect, inviting Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. And the third, more recently, empowering Iranian surrogates with Hamas to attack Israel.

Biden’s equivocation on condemnation for Hamas and support for Israel’s self-defense, his “two-state” rhetoric, has resulted in a surge of anti-Semitic protests mostly on college campuses across the U.S.

Thus, for moral clarity, I call your attention to an essay by Andrew Roberts, a military historian and author of 20 outstanding books including Churchill: Walking with Destiny. He is a conservative member of the UK’s upper house of the Parliament and a Visiting Research Fellow at Stanford’s Hoover Institution.

Roberts makes the clear case that Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement) fascists are far worse than the NAZI (National Socialist German Workers’ Party) fascists, and those supporting them in the U.S. should take note.

A few excerpts:

“The Nazis went to great lengths to hide their crimes from the world, because they knew they were crimes, Hamas has done the exact opposite, because they do not consider them to be so. … The sheer glee with which Hamas, by contrast, killed parents in front of their children and of children in front of their parents, was broadcast to the world. Nazi sadism was routine and widespread, but it wasn’t built into their actual operational plans in the way that Hamas’s sadism has been. … After invading countries, the Nazis often took hostages to ensure the compliance of the local population with their proclamations…but even the Nazis, foul as they were, did not deliberately take nine-month-old babies and young children, women, and octogenarians hostage, as Hamas has done. Nor did the Nazis use babies in incubators and children in hospital ICU units as human shields. … The Nazis recognized that if the Red Cross or other international agencies uncovered evidence of the Holocaust there would be an international outcry, whereas Hamas has spotted something about the modern world that has meant that instead of demonstrations against their atrocities and hostage-taking, the largest demonstrations globally have taken place against the victim, Israel. … The elimination of Jews is openly promised in the Hamas constitution, as it tacitly is in the ‘From the river to the sea’ chant so beloved of today’s demonstrators in the West. Gazans voted for Hamas in 2005 in far greater proportions than Germans voted for the Nazis in 1932, and a good proportion of them celebrated wildly when Hamas paraded its hostages through the streets of Gaza on the afternoon of October 7. … Hamas is—while taking into account the wild disparity in the sheer geographical and numerical extent of their crimes—qualitatively even more anti-Semitic than the Nazis were. One thing in which they are exactly equal, however, is that Nazi barbarism had to be utterly extirpated, and that goes for Hamas too.”

I encourage you to read Andrew Roberts’ full essay, “What Makes Hamas Worse Than the Nazis.”