The Patriot Post® · 'Biden-Harris 2020'? Actually It's the 'Harris-Biden' Ticket...

“We must make our election between economy and Liberty, or profusion and servitude.” —Thomas Jefferson (1816)

It’s official. Joe Biden¹ was informed by his campaign puppeteers² that they chose leftist Senator Kamala Harris³ (D-CA), an ineffective junior senator⁴, for the bottom (read: “TOP”) of his presidential ticket. They completed the selection of Biden’s [Insert Leftist Woman of Color Here] ticket requirement just in time for the Socialist Democrat Party⁵ convention commencing Monday.

Apparently, neither Michelle Obama nor Susan Rice⁶ passed Joe’s “sniff test,” both with too many skeletons in their closets. Harris, in Biden’s estimation, is the “first mainstream African American [woman] who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking [gal].”

This ticket will be “a storybook, man!”

Biden, who has long past his cognitive expiration date, issued a remote invitation to Harris from his basement was completely scripted⁷, we presume so he would recall with whom he was speaking.

On Harris, Biden said: “I need someone working alongside me who is smart, tough, and ready to lead. Kamala is that person.” By “ready to lead,” he means ready by high noon on Inauguration Day, January 20, 2021, to step in and name a leftist replacement for Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who has been propped up by a 2x4 since Donald Trump⁸ took office.

Harris is a fraud, neither a truth-teller nor a moderate⁹. She is far more liberal¹⁰ than Hillary Clinton¹¹

Within minutes of Biden’s announcement, both The New York Times and the Associated Press described Harris¹² as a “pragmatic moderate” whose record is “relatively centrist.” That would be the same leftist tabloid of record which previously provided unflattering details on why Harris’s presidential primary campaign failed¹³, noting she was “the only 2020 Democrat who has fallen hard out of the top tier of candidates” and “proved to be an uneven campaigner who changes her message and tactics to little effect.”

Even Fox News host, the spineless Chris Wallace, declared, “You know, she is not far to the left despite what Republicans are going to try to say.”

Only in the alternate Marxist universe¹⁴ occupied by Leftmedia propagandists¹⁵ does Harris qualify as “moderate” or “centrist.” Harris’s Senate record affirms she is a card-carrying socialist¹⁶, but you can expect to hear the “moderate” and “centrist” adjectives repeatedly — until November 4th.

And the Leftmedia better toe that line — recall that a gaggle of the nation’s most influential leftist women already put the media on notice about any criticism of Biden’s female VP. In a memo to “News Division Heads, Editors in Chiefs, Bureau Chiefs, Political Directors, Editors, Producers, Reporters, and Anchors¹⁷,” these women warned that no criticism of Harris would be tolerated.

Of course, the American Communist Party was quick to endorse the Biden-Harris ticket¹⁸, but qualified their endorsement noting: “Biden is not ‘better’ than Trump, in any meaningful way — except that he is not Trump. The struggle against this fascist regime needs to include voting against Trump by voting for Biden.”

Interestingly, there was no “Harris bounce” for Biden’s ticket after the announcement. In fact, though we put little credence in a CNN poll, Biden’s lead over Trump narrowed¹⁹ after the Harris announcement.

On his handler’s choice of Harris, David Axelrod, Barack Obama’s chief strategist in 2008 and 2012, suggested that Harris was not Biden’s choice²⁰, noting “others Biden considered may have fit more comfortably into partnership with him,” and suggests the “someone else” his handlers should have chosen was Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

But political analyst Ben Domenech outlines the reasons Harris was chosen²¹, noting as we have previously, first and foremost “This is going to be the Harris Administration with Joe as a figurehead.”

Notably, regarding the Biden campaign’s big demographic play for multitudes of emotionally incontinent liberal women voters²², I thought they had dispensed with that antiquated binary gender construct.

Yes, Harris would be the first woman president, assuming Democrats are still willing to distinguish between the genders, but as Matt Walsh notes²³: “‘Woman,’ by the light of the Left’s philosophy, is an arbitrary concept. It has no substance. It is not objective. It can mean anything and be anyone.”

Fact is, Biden’s handlers, as well as a most Americans²⁴, already know he’s a placeholder, or, as Joe calls himself, a “transitional candidate.” His strategy is to remain hunkered and bunkered²⁵ through Election Day. Biden’s handlers are also considering keeping Kamala in the basement²⁶, the strategy being to let the hatred for Trump defeat him without ever making their own policy objectives clear.

If elected, we estimate Biden will likely resign as early as his first year in office due to his progressive state of dementia²⁵. Demo-Speaker Nancy Pelosi has already seeded the legislation for Biden’s path to resign²⁷. This gives the Democrat Party plausible deniability to remove Biden, and of course, he will be complicit in that political maneuver, and, ostensibly “acquiesce” to House Democrats in order to cover the fact that the real candidate has been Kamala Harris all along. Thus, Democrats will avoid protest from Biden supporters that the transition fix was in before the election.

Democrat protagonists know they are really voting for a Harris administration.

(Incidentally, the last time the nation was saddled with a placeholder president was in 1944, when it was evident to his inner circle that Franklin Delano Roosevelt would not survive his fourth term²⁸. His handlers thus tapped Sen. Harry Truman (D-MO) as his successor, who indeed succeeded FDR three months after his 1945 election.)

Cleary, the LONG delay in selecting Harris was caused by big changes in the political calculus after Biden and his Democrat race-bait²⁹ tag team, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer³⁰, spent the last 10 weeks fomenting race riots in their Demo-controlled urban centers³¹ nationwide. They spuriously claimed that American justice is replete with “systemic racism³²” from top to bottom³³.

Thus, having incited mobs of radical leftists³⁴, Biden’s handlers were faced with a “Harris problem”: Now that Democrat opportunists had incorporated into their campaign the black supremacist³⁵ Marxists operating under the Black Lives Matter³⁶ brand, they needed to find a black female who wouldn’t dampen the enthusiasm of Stacey Abrams’s racially charged radicals to her left, nor upset the sensibilities of the more moderate Demo supporters and independent voters to her right.

The problem with Harris is that, despite her effort to portray herself as a “progressive” former prosecutor, even The New York Times concluded³⁷ that she “was often on the wrong side of history when she served as California’s attorney general.” By “wrong side,” the NYT means “right side,” which is why the far Left may reject her as the next president.

After adopting the “defund the police³⁸” mantra, Biden puts the former chief law enforcement officer (attorney general) for the most populous state in the nation (California) on his ticket?

Bernie Sanders’s former national press secretary, Briahna Joy Gray, summed up the problem: “We are in the midst of the largest protest movement in American history, the subject of which is excessive policing, and the Democratic Party chose a ‘top cop’ and the author of the Joe Biden crime bill to save us from Trump. The contempt for the base is, wow.”

Outlining a few of Harris’s more egregious offenses as AG, Loyola law professor Lara Bazelon declared in The New York Times³⁷: “Harris fought tooth and nail to uphold wrongful convictions that had been secured through official misconduct that included evidence tampering, false testimony and the suppression of crucial information by prosecutors.”

Further, in 2014, after a federal judge ordered the release of nonviolent offenders for parole in California, then-AG Harris argued³⁹ that her state prisons would lose “an important labor pool.” (Talk about keeping black folks on the Demo plantation⁴⁰…) Harris never apologized for that assertion, and she hopes Biden’s constituents will forget about her record as a “Draconian Prosecutor⁴¹.”

By the way, despite her record of locking up pot smokers⁴², recall that when asked if she had smoked marijuana, Harris responded, “Half my family’s from Jamaica — are you kidding me?” That was funny, except the “stereotype” drew a strong rebuke⁴³ from her estranged father, Donald J. Harris, who responded: “My dear departed grandmothers, as well as my deceased parents, must be turning in their grave right now to see their family’s name, reputation and proud Jamaican identity being connected, in any way, jokingly or not, with the fraudulent stereotype of a pot-smoking joy seeker and in the pursuit of identity politics. Speaking for myself and my immediate Jamaican family, we wish to categorically dissociate ourselves from this travesty.”

The Wall Street Journal’s Jason Willick pondered⁴⁴, “Can a prosecutor win the Democratic presidential nomination?” We will see.

Moreover, when her black supporters find out she is the direct descendent and beneficiary of slave-holders⁴⁵, will that pass the sniff test or will the cancel Harris?

Unfortunately for Harris, Trump, who calls her Biden’s “political living will,” brilliantly preempted her “criminal-justice reform” recovery platform by working across party lines to enact reforms⁴⁶ last year.

As it stands, Biden’s handlers believe Harris will appeal to enough moderates and independents to make up for the radical leftists who see her as a political prop, and blacks who see her as lacking a real connection to their community. But to bridge that gap, Harris has endeavored to adopt radical socialist policies from Bernie Sanders⁴⁷.

Harris votes with Sanders on 92% of legislation⁴⁸ and was his socialized healthcare cosponsor⁴⁹. She also cosponsored⁵⁰ with Sanders the so-called “Green New Deal⁵¹” and, of course, cosponsored⁵² the absurd $14 trillion “reparations rebate⁵³.”

She also supports open borders⁵⁴, free healthcare for illegal aliens⁵⁵, and compared Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to the KKK⁵⁶.

Moreover (and as fodder for Trump campaign ads), Harris’s problems with Biden are no small matter.

In the second Democrat presidential primary debate last year, Hawaii Representative Tulsi Gabbard confronted Harris⁵⁷ about her record as California’s attorney general — claiming her tough-on-crime policies were unjust. In an effort to recover, Harris attacked Biden for his support of racist segregationists⁵⁸. She also asked for an apology from Biden — which he didn’t deliver.

But alas, her standing in the polls dropped after those summer confrontations, and she never recovered, ultimately withdrawing from the race in December.

Of course, Biden’s campaign was on life support too²⁵, as he finished a dismal fourth in Iowa, fifth in New Hampshire, and got clobbered by 26 points by Bernie Sanders in Nevada. But once he received the endorsement of Demo House Whip Jim Clyburn just ahead of the South Carolina primary, he regained momentum on Super Tuesday (or “Super Thursday⁵⁹” as Biden gaffed it) for a first-place finish.

A bigger problem would be that on April 3rd last year, after several women accused Creepy Joe of sexual assault, Harris declared⁶⁰, “I believe them and I respect them being able to tell their story and having the courage to do it.”

So, she has joined the ticket of a man who she believes panders to racists and is guilty of sexual assault?

Just who is the real Kamala Harris? There are personal profiles⁶¹ and policy primers⁶², but suffice it to say, she’s to the left⁶³ of Sanders and former Cherokee candidate Elizabeth Warren⁶⁴.

On a personal level, Harris is most assuredly not the product of poor and unwed parents⁶⁵, as was the case with Barack Obama⁶⁶. But like Obama, she only had one black parent, and her parents divorced when she was seven, which is why early years were in California and her formative years spent in Canada with her mother.

Her mother, Shyamala Gopalan, was a scientist who emigrated from India. Her citizenship status when Harris was born, is unknown, giving rise to that pesky constitutional question about Harris’s eligibility to be president⁶⁷. The question about her citizenship is much more legitimate⁶⁸ than the spurious questions about Obama’s citizenship. But who pays attention to that fallacious errancy of so-called “Birthright Citizenship⁶⁹” these days…

Her father, father, Don Harris, was a Stanford University economist who emigrated from Jamaica. The Stanford Daily⁷⁰ described Harris as a “Marxist scholar,” whose tenure was being questioned because he was “a pied piper leading students astray from neo-Classical economics.”

According to The New York Times, Donald and Shyamala met while attending a “black study group⁷¹.” That group was actually the Afro-American Association, which championed Fidel Castro and Che Guevara. (Shades of Barack Obama’s⁶⁶ father and his Marxist mentors⁷².)

A chip off the familial block, when Harris was elected to the Senate, she appointed a pro-Marxist, Karine Jean-Pierre, as her Chief of Staff. Among other Marxist groups, Jean-Pierre was active with the NHaiti Support Network, which modeled policies after the communist Workers World Party.

BTW, despite the fact that Harris’s parents were from India and Jamaica, the racist Demo Party⁷³ ran her as the first “African-American” candidate for vice president. Why? She is every bit as much “Asian American.”

Her privileged academic pedigree notwithstanding, Harris graduated from second and third tier colleges, Howard University and UC Hastings Law School, after which she failed the California bar exam on her first pass.

She then spent a few years working in the office of Oakland’s district attorney, until she began an affair in 1994 with the powerful California Assembly Speaker, Willie Brown. Brown, who was 30 years older than Harris, was still married at the time Harris became what local media called, “the speaker’s new steady.”

Harris owes her career launch to Brown’s “helping hand⁷⁴,” who appointed her to two “patronage jobs⁷⁵,” as it was described by the San Francisco Chronicle, the latter paying $100,000 – big bucks in 1995. Notably, Brown was the subject of multiple FBI investigations over his political appointments.

Harris certainly did not let the age gap interfere with the DEI⁷⁶ (didn’t earn it) doors Brown could open for her⁷⁷.

Brown, who then became Mayor of San Francisco, undoubtedly paved the political path for Harris’s first big elected job a decade later as District Attorney of San Francisco. Asked about Brown’s patronage appointments, Harris responded, “Whether you agree or disagree with the system, I did the work.”

Well, as Democrats are fond of saying, “Sex work is real work.”

Harris served as SanFran DA until 2011, before being succeeded by the equally corrupt leftist DA, George Gascon⁷⁸, backed by billionaire leftist George Soros⁷⁹.

She then was appointed by Gov. Jerry “Moonbeam” Brown as California Attorney General in 2011, where she served until he paved her political path to replace retiring Sen. Barbara Boxer.

Ironically, Brown advised Harris to pass on Biden’s offer⁸⁰ to join his ticket.

In 2014, Harris married a leftist “white privilege⁸¹” lawyer, Douglas Emhoff, who was actually her age (then-49). Among other things, his firm specialized in business with the Red Chinese⁸². Perhaps this is what former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo⁸³ meant about Red Chinese “inside the gates⁸⁴.”

They live in a posh multimillion-dollar Brentwood mansion and list millions in assets⁸⁵. Kamala’s net worth is estimated at $6.3 million⁸⁶.

So much for a connection to working-class blacks, who constitute one of the Democrats’ most loyal constituencies.

In 2017, after six years as California attorney general under leftist Governor Jerry “Moonbeam” Brown, she succeeded California leftist Senator Barbara Boxer to serve with aging Senator Dianne Feinstein, where Harris⁸⁷ made a name for herself leading⁸⁸ the disgraceful Senate mob’s obstructionist confirmation hearings⁸⁹ of now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh⁹⁰.

So, what does Harris do for the Biden ticket? Again, in effect, this is a Harris-Biden ticket, and the reason why last year I put Harris at the top of my speculative list⁹¹ of Biden running mates is because I estimated then, as I do now, that as the real Biden placeholder, she’ll be the most difficult opponent for Trump to beat. That will be especially true given the millions of dollars allocated for swing-state advertising, funded by the “Archenemies of Liberty⁹²,” George Soros, Tom Steyer, Jeff Bezos, and Michael Bloomberg.

Billionaire socialist Soros⁷⁹ has made clear that the CV19⁹³ pandemic provides a “revolutionary moment⁹⁴.” You know, leftists never let a good crisis go to waste! According to Soros: “I would describe it as a revolutionary moment when the range of possibilities is much greater than in normal times. What is inconceivable in normal times becomes not only possible but actually happens. People are disoriented and scared.”

Harris also has the backing of Soros’s socialist heir apparent, his son Alexander, who said: “I decided she would be the pick. I told my dad and he agreed. The rest was just a formality.”

According to uber leftist Michael Moore: “Kamala Harris is one of the most progressive Senators in the US Senate and will be the most progressive Vice President in the history of the United States. … She checks nearly every box on Bernie’s platform: Living Wage, Choice, LGBTQ+ equality, peace, child care, etc. … Our movement is on fire now, tens and tens of millions of us in the streets, at the polling sites, at home, organizing online, young people at the forefront, Black America once again saving us and forcing us to be what we say we are but never were. This is our moment.”

As political analyst Marc Thiessen observed: “The left sees these people, a Biden-Harris ticket, as a Trojan horse. … Hiding inside is an army of socialists led by Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and the rest and they’re going to come pouring out as soon as he’s through the White House gates and impose a left-wing agenda on the United States.”

Indeed, it’s the “Biden-Harris 2020” campaign, but in reality if that ticket wins, it will be Harris ‘21-'22-'23-'24. I believe confidence in the feckless Biden ticket is bolstered by Harris, and in fact she may push that ticket over the finish line. When she will step in for Biden will, as noted previously, require a lot of political calculation based on who controls the House and Senate in 2021. If Harris steps in before the halfway mark in Biden’s first term, she would only qualify to run in the 2024 presidential election. If she waits until at least half of Biden’s first term is over, she could step in and then qualify for both the 2024 election and if elected, then again for reelection in 2028.

She is a perilous Trump opponent. But Trump’s greatest adversary is not Harris or Biden — it’s the amount of unmitigated hatred the Left and their Leftmedia propagandists harbor toward Trump.

That not withstanding, all that race calculation doesn’t change the fact that, as I have noted previously, “The great irony about the Biden’s VP race-pandering charade is that the Democrat Party is the most enduring monument to racism⁹⁵ in America.”

As for Biden, he will spend the weeks until the election refining his skills as a historical revisionist – particularly in regard to his decades as a do-nothing politician. He denies his support for the Iraq War⁹⁶, the fact he was AWOL during the civil rights movement⁹⁷, lying about his record of putting immigrant “kids in cages⁹⁸,” and his claim he did not oppose opposition⁹⁹ the raid to kill Osama bin Laden¹⁰⁰. Biden has been, consistently, perennially wrong¹⁰¹ on foreign policy.

Of course, he is now trying to rewrite both what he said and did not say¹⁰² regarding CV19⁹³. As I have noted, our nation is very fortunate that President Trump’s policies positioned the nation’s economy to be very strong ahead of the Covid pandemic. Had this been a “Clinton economy,” we would be in far worse shape than we are now.

Finally, in a public forum on 14 September, Harris referred to¹⁰³ “a Harris administration, together with Joe Biden as the president of the United States.” The next day, Biden referenced¹⁰⁴ a “Harris-Biden administration.” In Biden’s case this might have been a “slip of the teleprompter¹⁰⁵,” but the point stands. Harris is at the helm and she is a perilous threat to Liberty.

Update: After four days of obfuscation about who the real Joe Biden is¹⁰⁶, as anticipated, the Democrat convention hardly referenced the Biden-Harris agenda¹⁰⁷, offering little more than platitudes¹⁰⁸ and sleight of hand¹⁰⁹, making clear that their strategy is to run on hatred for Trump.

PS: Because I know you want to get this right… Kamala says her name is not “CAMEL-uh” or “Kuh-MAHL-uh” or “KARMEL-uh,” but but rather “COMMA-lah or CALM-ala.”

Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis
Pro Deo et Libertate — 1776

---

Join us in prayer for our Patriots in uniform and their families — Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen — standing in harm’s way, and for our nation’s First Responders. We also ask prayer for your Patriot team, that our mission would seed and encourage the Spirit of Liberty¹¹⁰ in the hearts and minds of our countrymen.