Publisher’s note: We receive hundreds of comments and can only select a few to publish in our Tuesday and Thursday “Reader Comments” section. Every article we post has social media links to start a conversation online and a “Comment” button to send a comment to our editors.

Re: What’s Behind the Sudden AI Shriek-Fest?

“As usual, a VERY well-written, well-thought-out piece from Mr. Andrews! The late great Rush Limbaugh used to warn us to pay very close attention whenever the Democrats want to ‘team up’ with the Russians or the ChiComs. AI leadership is essential if the U.S. is to stay ahead of the communists and socialists. I say, ‘Full speed ahead!’” —Florida

Re: Turning Jurors Into Targets

“This is not the first case in which ‘public opinion’ has weighted the scales of justice. The Minnesota trial of Derek Chauvin and his fellow officers regarding the death of George Floyd is an example. After the trial, at least one of the jurors admitted fear of the consequences of an acquittal, because it was obvious that a not-guilty verdict would be used as an excuse for expanded rioting and other violence. It would have helped if public officials such as Governor Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey had publicly called for everyone to respect the verdict before the jury began deliberations, but having sparked riots all over the country with their unfounded charges of ‘systemic racism,’ they were not about to backtrack.” —Minnesota

Re: The Left’s Medicare for All Shenanigans

“Social Security and Medicare are non-voluntary programs that we, the American people, have allowed our government to run into the ground. You are correct in stating that government should not be in the healthcare business. We have allowed this nonsense, and we need to reverse it. As a capitalist society, think of the money private businesses could make if they hand our healthcare back to us to manage!” —Tennessee

“It’s a very bad analogy to compare defense spending with Medicare. Constitutionally, the government is obligated to defend this country; it is not obligated to provide medical care for all. You point out something very important that needs to be changed: Bernie Sanders and his ilk all have the best medical care available. They should have to participate in the same medical programs they want to foist on everyone else.” —Nebraska

Re: Income Is Up, Poverty Is Down, and Inflation Is the Next Target

“Great synopsis, Mr. Jackson. I agree that there are bright spots in the economy, and why the Republican Party remains silent on this — in the months prior to the midterm elections — is baffling.” —South Carolina

Re: Communist China’s Exploitation of Surrogacy and Birthright Citizenship

“Meanwhile, the Chinese control the illegal marijuana farm industry; we have no idea how many Chinese biolabs are floating around out there in Middle America; and the ChiComs are still stealing us blind on tech. And our response is mostly to lift our legs and fart. It’s really hard to win a war that you don’t know you’re fighting — or that you don’t care to fight.” —Oklahoma

Re: American Sports Fans Are Anti-Woke

“The irony of this kind of stuff is that radical Islamists and their supporters are exposing themselves for what they are. It sometimes looks very ugly, but at the same time, the exposure of what we are up against can help promote awareness, which did not seem to exist prior to 9/11.” —Texas

Re: The Left’s New Weapon: The SCOTUS Slow-Walk

“Stringing the process out until it’s too late to protect the next election from fraud has been the objective of Democrats in Congress as well as those taking court action. The SAVE America Act may indeed be passed through the reconciliation process in the next several weeks, but it will be immediately blocked from taking effect until 2028. And then the Democrats will try to block it in the courts, claiming without evidence that it is ‘voter suppression.’ When that happens, it would be a great benefit for a judge to dismiss the case and impose sanctions for frivolousness. The Constitution clearly gave Congress the power to override state election laws with weak or nonexistent protections against fraud in voting for federal offices, and that is probably why that power was provided. The courts are not the place for losers of political questions to force their opinions on the majority when the winners have not violated any rights. Sanctions would send the message that obstruction by lawfare is an abuse of the legal system.” —Minnesota

Re: Nightmare Mom Cheered, While Super Mom Convicted

“Thank God there was a man on the jury who had good sense and wisdom, not personal ‘feelings.’” —North Carolina

Re: Lindsay Clancy’s Lawyer Is Poisoning the Judicial System

“Lawyer Reddington should be disbarred for chastising a juror over having the moral fortitude he lacks.” —North Carolina