Democrats are in full-blown panic, teetering on the edge of collapse as President Donald Trump, once again, has them cornered in a fight he’s poised to win. They’re on the losing side of an 80/20 proposition, yet still peddling the fiction of victory to their loyal followers. After Trump upended their narrative, they’re spinning DC crime statistics like a gyroscope, desperately trying to regain balance. MSNBC and CNN are in certified meltdown mode, their safe spaces likely packed to the brim. On left-leaning social media, the unraveling is in overdrive; what few threads tethered them to reality are fraying fast.

In the shadowy world of scammers, liars, and con artists, nothing is more dangerous than a falsifiable proposition — a claim that can be definitively proven true or false. These deceivers thrive in the murky realm of unfalsifiability, where their words are accepted as truth because reality is obscured or impossible to verify. Their worst nightmare is when the mark — their target — starts questioning the narrative and demands evidence. This dynamic isn’t limited to street hustlers or Ponzi schemers; it’s rampant in politics, where unfalsifiable claims shield agendas from scrutiny.

Democrats are grappling with this fear as their long-standing narratives on border security, deportations, and urban violence are being dismantled by tangible, falsifiable outcomes under Trump’s policies. For decades, politicians on both sides have sidestepped reality, pushing ineffective policies that never tested whether a problem could truly be solved. Their power comes from spending taxpayer money, not resolving issues. Scammers rely on propositions that resist verification, like a psychic claiming to commune with the dead, offering vague predictions that can’t be disproven. Similarly, political leaders make grandiose promises or dire warnings that are hard to test, allowing them to dodge accountability.

For years, Democrats insisted that securing the U.S. border required sweeping legislation and billions in spending — an unfalsifiable claim when no one acted. It was a safe narrative, deflecting responsibility while preserving the status quo. Yet within 90 days of taking office, Trump implemented executive actions that slashed illegal border crossings and eventually halted them entirely. This proved the border could be secured without the bloated measures Democrats championed. The falsifiable outcome — measurable reductions in crossings — exposed the hollowness of their position, sending shockwaves of fear through their ranks as their rhetoric crumbled under scrutiny.

All America needed was a new president.

The debate over mass deportations follows a similar script. Democrats long argued that deporting large numbers of illegal immigrants was logistically impossible and economically disruptive — an unfalsifiable claim when untested. But Trump’s administration is dismantling this myth. The swift quelling of the Los Angeles riots, paired with the construction of “Alligator Alcatraz” — a symbolic and practical deterrent — has sparked a wave of self-deportations. These concrete actions deliver measurable results, shattering the narrative that mass deportations are unfeasible. When the mark — in this case, the American public — sees evidence contradicting the con, the game unravels. Democrats are visibly rattled, their once-safe assertions failing under the weight of reality.

This pattern extends to urban violence, particularly in Washington, DC. Democrats and their media allies have claimed that DC’s rampant crime requires complex social programs and incremental reforms, dismissing stronger measures as authoritarian or ineffective. Yet Trump’s invocation of the Home Rule Act to tackle DC’s violence is yielding results. By deploying federal resources, increasing law enforcement presence, and targeting gang activity, Trump is creating falsifiable outcomes: crime rates are measurable, and reductions can be verified. This terrifies those who rely on unfalsifiable excuses to avoid accountability. The aggressive pushback from Democrats and the media, framing Trump’s actions as overreach, betrays their desperation to cling to a narrative that reality is being dismantled.

Historically, political con artists falter when their claims are tested. In the 1990s, critics of welfare reform warned that cutting benefits would devastate families — a seemingly unfalsifiable prediction of doom. But the 1996 Welfare Reform Act led to increased employment and reduced poverty, collapsing their narrative. Similarly, the “defund the police” movement crumbled when cities like Minneapolis and Seattle saw crime spikes after slashing police budgets, providing falsifiable evidence against the activists’ claims.

When the mark gets wise, the game changes. For scammers, it’s the moment a victim demands proof. For politicians, it’s when the public sees results that contradict the narrative. Democrats are feeling this pressure as Trump’s actions — on borders, deportations, and urban safety — turn their unfalsifiable claims into testable propositions. The media’s frantic attempts to blunt these moves through distortion or selective reporting underscore their fear of a public awakening. Falsifiability is the enemy of deception, whether in a street hustle or a political campaign. As Trump delivers measurable results, the Democrats’ safe haven of unfalsifiability shrinks, and with it, their ability to control the narrative.