You Make a Difference!

Our mission and operations are funded entirely by Patriots like you! Please support the 2021 Patriots' Day Campaign now.

Jun. 3, 2014

The First Lady’s Nanny State

Michelle Obama blasts anyone who “rejects science” when it comes to school lunch.

First Lady Michelle Obama’s op-ed last week attacking opposition to her school lunch program follows a classic pattern that we’ve come to expect from the Obama White House. Push a government mandate on policy where none exists, then attack as un-American any criticism of said mandate, no matter how reasonable that criticism might be.

In her opinion piece published in The New York Times, Mrs. Obama claimed that the House of Representatives, namely Republicans, are trying to dismantle federal nutrition standards for public schools that she has championed as part of her “Let’s Move” campaign for healthier eating for school-age youngsters. Her intentions may have been in the right place, and indeed, who wouldn’t want kids to have healthy eating choices? But the federal government is most certainly the wrong conduit for this effort.

While the First Lady touts a 90% compliance rate among schools, a recent Government Accountability Office survey notes that officials in 48 states have reported a high amount of food waste among some of their districts. The report goes on to state that since becoming law, the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act has caused numerous problems for schools across the country. The rigid mandates of the Act have created a one-size-fits-all system that have caused food procurement and budget issues for smaller districts and schools in certain regions. The cost of developing and maintaining menus that comply with the Act is so high that some schools have to transfer money away from teaching in order to meet the standards. Acquiring and storing food and purchasing new kitchen equipment that schools would otherwise not need are among the biggest hits to local budgets.

Mrs. Obama conveniently ignored these facts in her op-ed, instead claiming that the House’s attempts to loosen some of the regulations to allow individual states and districts more leeway to craft their school lunch programs is a roll-back that rejects nutritional science. She also credits her own program for a downward trend in the childhood obesity rate that actually peaked in 2003 and has remained at a flat 17% since, according to a recent study by the Centers for Disease Control.

She writes, “As parents, we always put our children’s interests first. We wake up every morning and go to bed every night worrying about their well-being and their futures.” That is the point, though. Parents put their children’s interests first. It is not the government’s responsibility to interfere in that. As Daren Bakst, of the Heritage Foundation writes, “The administration and Michelle Obama may want to dig in and not give an inch on their standards, but this only hurts children.”

If Mrs. Obama really wants what is best for children, then she should recognize that individual school districts should be allowed discretion in helping to shape their own nutritional guidelines.

Start a conversation using these share links:

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!


“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2021 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.