Mona Charen: “The major media’s account of the Supreme Court’s decision in the Hobby Lobby case was typical of the way the case has been misreported from the start. The New York Times headline read, ‘Supreme Court Rejects Contraceptives Mandate for Some Corporations.’ Politico led with ‘SCOTUS sides with Hobby Lobby on birth control.’ Others were similar. That’s not what the case was about, and you’d think that major news organizations might at least get the basic facts straight. … Hobby Lobby provided coverage for 18 different methods of birth control. What both the Greens and the Hahns objected to were the regulations promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services that would have required them, on pain of severe fines, to cover four more methods, including the morning after pill, that the litigants (and not just they) consider abortifacients. No matter how many times the press calls this a case about contraception, the truth is that it was about abortion. Neither family could, in conscience, be a party to paying for abortion. The HHS regulations exempted some corporations from the regulations, including churches, some nonprofits and the ‘exclusively religious activities of any religious order.’ Religion, the government essentially argued, was something that people do on Sunday mornings or in specifically religious organizations like Catholic Charities. But a for-profit corporation, the government argued, could not possibly ‘exercise religion.’ … Hobby Lobby, for example, would have incurred fines of up to $475 million per year.”