Why We Ask:

Our mission and operations are funded 100% by conservatives like you. Please help us continue to extend Liberty to the next generation and support the 2020 Year-End Campaign today. —Christy S. Chesterton, Director of Advancement

Louis DeBroux / Sep. 28, 2016

Gun Control Meant to Make Victims of Blacks

A Leftmedia columnist completely misses the racist history of gun control.

Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson has a nearly unblemished track record of offering up hard-hitting, powerful, emotional editorials which assess America’s most pressing issues and are almost always … wrong. His most recent anti-gun, anti-police commentary, “In America, gun rights are for whites only,” was no exception.

Robinson starts off by regurgitating the inflammatory leftist narrative of a police-driven war on young black men, claiming, “If you are a black man in America, exercising your constitutional right to keep and bear arms can be fatal. You might think that the National Rifle Association and its amen chorus would be outraged, but apparently they believe Second Amendment rights are for whites only.”

And that is where he goes off the rails. He is reflexively programmed to see everything through the prism of race, even when race has little or no bearing on an issue or incident.

Regarding the supposed apathy of the NRA toward gun-owning minorities, he is just flat wrong. It was a black man, Otis McDonald, who was aided by the NRA as he sued the City of Chicago for unlawful infringements of his Second Amendment rights. McDonald, 76 (in 2010, when the case was decided by the Supreme Court), was refused permission to own a handgun for self-defense, despite living in a neighborhood infested with drug dealers and gangbangers. His home had been robbed five times, but he was denied the ability to defend himself. The NRA helped McDonald win a landmark case for individual gun rights.

It was also the NRA that came to the aid of poor black residents of Delaware who were denied the right to own a firearm, it having been prohibited in public housing. It was also the NRA that brought national attention (and pressure) to the blatantly unfair imprisonment of Shaneen Allen, a black Pennsylvania woman, who was jailed after believing, in error, that her concealed carry permit allowed her to carry her weapon into New Jersey (not an unreasonable assumption, as dozens of states have concealed carry reciprocity agreements).

To be fair to Robinson, though he focuses on the recent shootings of Keith Lamont Scott (a convicted felon who had an illegal firearm and previously had a restraining order taken out against him when his wife reported he beat her and threatened to kill her and her children) and Terrence Crutcher (shot after refusing police orders and then reaching into his pants) as unjustified, he also notes the tragic shooting of Philando Castille, a black Minnesota man and concealed carry permit holder who appeared to have been shot by a panicked cop. This shooting does indeed appear to be unjustified. Robinson complains that the NRA’s statement following the shooting was tepid (the NRA basically said it would reserve judgment until the facts came out), but NRA membership was outraged by the lack of a more forceful statement, disproving the idea that NRA members don’t care about minorities.

Lost in all of the race-baiting recriminations is that fact that gun control laws have racist origins, hearkening back to the darkest history of racism in America.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, in his concurring opinion in the previously noted case of McDonald v. Chicago, outlines some of the history of this racism. You see, just as minimum wage laws were originally passed as a way of keeping non-union Southern black laborers from taking jobs from the more expensive, white Northern union labor, gun control laws were passed as a way of disarming blacks so as to leave them defenseless against the attacks of Ku Klux Klan members and other racial supremacist terrorists.

Among many other examples, Thomas described the Hamburg Massacre of 1876, in which a white militia murdered a troop of black militiamen for holding an Independence Day parade through their mostly black town. The white militia commander, “Pitchfork” Ben Tillman, later described this massacre with pride: “[T]he leading white men of Edgefield” had decided “to seize the first opportunity that the negroes might offer them to provoke a riot and teach the negroes a lesson by having the whites demonstrate their superiority by killing as many of them as was justifiable.” None of the murderers were punished.

Thomas continued, “Organized terrorism like that perpetuated by Tillman and his cohorts proliferated in the absence of federal enforcement of constitutional rights. Militias such as the Ku Klux Klan, the Knights of the White Camellia, the White Brotherhood, the Pale Faces, and the ‘76 Association spread terror among blacks and white Republicans by breaking up Republican meetings, threatening political leaders, and whipping black militiamen. … These groups raped, murdered, lynched, and robbed as a means of intimidating, and instilling pervasive fear in, those whom they despised.”

Ironically, Robinson’s call for stricter gun control laws will only hurt those he purports to want to help. He would leave untold numbers of inner city blacks defenseless against the drug dealers, thugs, gang members and violent criminals that have infested their communities — like those who robbed Otis McDonald repeatedly.

Contrary to the narrative of Black Lives Matter, there is no police war on young black men. The vast majority of murdered blacks are murdered by other blacks. The relative handful of black men shot and killed by police has turned out, with few exceptions, to have been justified by the criminal or threatening actions of those who were shot.

When shootings by police are unjustified, the officer should be prosecuted and punished. But the innocent are done no favors by weaving a fabric of lies about these shootings for political gain, or by disarming the innocent so as to leave them defenseless.

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!

★ PUBLIUS ★

“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2020 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.