Monday Opinion
Read Hans von Spakovsky, Caleb Verbois, Marc A. Thiessen, Kathryn Jean Lopez, Rebecca Hagelin and more.
Best of Right Opinion
- Hans von Spakovsky: GOP Memo Raises Serious Questions About FBI, DOJ
- Caleb Verbois: Memos, Trump, and Trust
- Marc A. Thiessen: Trump’s New Immigration Proposal Is Quintessentially Presidential
- Kathryn Jean Lopez: Moral Cowardice in the Senate
- Rebecca Hagelin: Rot, or Revival?
For more of today’s columns, visit Right Opinion.
Opinion in Brief
Hans von Spakovsky: “One would think that senior law enforcement officials would have realized they had a professional duty to tell the court about the origins of the dossier and about Steele himself, since that information was relevant to the credibility of the information drawn from the dossier. Yet, according to the Republican memo, the senior FBI and Justice Department officials involved in the application and re-application process failed in that duty. The staff memo says nothing regarding what Page is alleged to have done. Thus, the reader is not able to assess whether or not a FISA warrant targeting him was a valid government objective. Nor do we know what information — from the dossier or elsewhere — led the government to reasonably believe that Page was ‘an agent of a foreign power.’ Clearly, the FISA memo released is but a portion of a much larger story. If Washington works the way it typically works, the fuller story will come out eventually. It should, because the public has a right to know what happened. But if the main elements of this staff memo prove to be true — that key government officials failed to disclose the tawdry facts about the unverified Steele dossier, its origin, and who paid for it, in the middle of a presidential election — there could and should be serious ramifications for all of those involved.”