Publisher's Note: One of the most significant things you can do to promote Liberty is to support our mission. Please make your gift to the 2022 Year-End Campaign today. Thank you! —Mark Alexander, Publisher

Nate Jackson / February 8, 2022

Sarah Palin vs. The New York Times

She should win a defamation case over an editorial blaming her for murder.

Former Alaska Governor and vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin is in the midst of a libel and defamation lawsuit against The New York Times. Despite our love for the First Amendment and caution in setting bad precedents, it is a case she should win, and not just because we’d love to see the Times raked over the legal coals.

For those who don’t recall, it all began when a mentally deranged man opened fire on a Tucson crowd in 2011, killing six, including U.S. District Court Chief Judge John Roll and a nine-year-old girl, as well as gravely wounding Democrat Congresswoman Gabby Giffords. As leftists always do, they turned the caskets of the dead — and the brain-damaged Giffords — into a platform for gun control. Giffords’s husband, Mark Kelly, even won an Arizona Senate seat pledging to fight for that Democrat agenda item.

As the official left arm of the Democrats’ propaganda wing, The New York Times editorialized more than once in favor of their schemes. In one of those editorials — six years after the fact, and just after a deranged Bernie Sanders fanboy nearly murdered several Republican congressman at baseball practice — the Times crossed an important line, specifically blaming Palin for the attack. You see, her SarahPAC website featured “stylized cross hairs” [sic] on a map of congressional districts including Giffords’s, and the sages on the Times editorial board divined that these crosshairs incited the killer.

“The link to political incitement was clear,” the Times wrote. Except it wasn’t clear at all, because it didn’t even exist. The Times later “corrected” the editorial to remove that assertion, but it kept the overall implication against Palin. Besides, the damage was done. And it was all because, as our Thomas Gallatin wrote at the time, “The Times’ editors are not journalists but leftist activists who clearly care little for reporting the truth.”

It’s rightly very difficult to win libel lawsuits, especially for public figures like Palin. Nevertheless, as political analyst Kevin Williamson explains, this one’s pretty clear:

For a claim to be libelous, it must check three boxes, once it has been established that the claim was published and the subject identified: (1) the claim has to be false, which this one was; (2) it has to be defamatory, which there is no real question this one was: Not only is the claim defamatory on its face, it was obviously meant to be defamatory, in that the entire point of linking Palin to the shooting was to demean and discredit her; and (3) when the claim involves a public figure such as Palin, it has to have been published with “actual malice” or “reckless disregard for the truth.” There is a pretty good case to be made for actual malice: Palin had nothing at all to do with the story, and the only point of dragging her name into it was to damage her reputation and her political prospects. But even if you think “actual malice” is a coin toss, can anybody seriously argue that the Times’ performance in this matter was anything other than reckless in its disregard for the truth?

Indeed, the paper’s “fact-checker” didn’t bother to check this particular claim, and she admitted so in court. As also determined during questioning, Times reporter Elizabeth Williamson, who drafted the editorial, ignored the objections of fellow editorial board member Jesse Wegman regarding the specific claim about Palin.

Both of those facts, as well as the fact of a correction itself, help Palin’s case in a big way. The just result would be a loss for the Times and a big payout to Palin. The best long-term outcome would be a bit of introspection and self-correction by the Leftmedia generally. Given that we’re likelier to strike oil in the men’s room here in our humble shop, we won’t hold our breath.

Update 2/15: As if to illustrate our point about defamation suits being extremely difficult to win, U.S. District Court Judge Jed Rakoff announced he will toss Palin’s suit, even though the jury is still deliberating. It will likely be appealed.

Update 2/16: And the jury ruled against Palin too, though jurors found out about the judge’s order, which may fuel Palin’s appeal.

Start a conversation using these share links:

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!


“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2022 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.