Did you hear that freshman Republican Representative George Santos was indicted yesterday? The Leftmedia breathlessly reported it as the top story everywhere. The charges are serious, and we’re not defending Santos in this space. But isn’t it curious that the announcement of charges related to Santos’s alleged misuse of thousands of dollars came yesterday morning while House Republicans were giving us the goods on how the Biden Crime Family laundered millions of dollars and colluded with the deep state to cover it up?

Why, it’s almost like that timing was planned.

When the Leftmedia did report about Biden, it was to misinform. “House Republican Report Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by President Biden,” headlined The New York Times. Essentially, however, the Times is congratulating Biden for the fact that he and his family created a web of deception so convoluted that Republicans have yet to fully untangle it.

It would be the eighth wonder of the world if the Times gave that same presumption of innocence to Donald Trump. Instead, Democrats impeached Trump for what Biden actually did, and the media helped Democrats. Biden is on the record disclosing the fact that when he was vice president, he called on the president of Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was investigating Hunter Biden. Media “fact-checkers” insist you shouldn’t believe your lyin’ ears.

In any case, the lack of evidence regarding Joe Biden is in part because the FBI is concealing some of it. A whistleblower says the FBI has evidence that directly ties Joe to this corruption, but the bureau somehow missed the deadline to turn it over to House investigators.

“It’s clear from the FBI’s response that the unclassified record the Oversight Committee subpoenaed exists,” said House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, “but they are refusing to provide it to the Committee.”

Maybe it got lost in the mail.

Meanwhile, the president is publicly interfering with any legal investigation by repeatedly declaring his son’s innocence. When the media does ask him about it, the reference is vague and there’s no intent to follow up.

The truth is that from the moment Hunter Biden’s laptop was discovered and reported by the New York Post — and the Leftmedia and Big Tech immediately suppressed it to influence the 2020 election — this all has been about Joe Biden’s corruption. Indeed, we already know he was lying when he claimed he had “never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings” or that “my son has not made money” in China.

“Many in the media have said that no transactions happened while Joe Biden was vice president. We have proven that wrong,” Comer said. “Joe Biden said during 2020 that his family never took any money from China. Today, we have proven that wrong.”

Indeed, Joe is the “Big Guy” who held the position of power and influence as vice president. As Republicans made clear yesterday, Biden’s tenure in Barack Obama’s White House is when at least nine members of his family suddenly set up more than 20 shell companies through which to funnel massive amounts of money from dubious foreign companies and countries, including China and Romania.

As The Wall Street Journal recounts, that roster includes “Hunter, James, James’s wife Sara, Hallie [Biden — the widow of Hunter’s deceased brother Beau and later Hunter’s girlfriend], Hunter’s ex-wife (Kathleen Buhle), Hunter’s current wife (Melissa Cohen), and three children or grandchildren of Joe or James.”

It seems the only family member left out of the graft operation was Hunter’s illegitimate daughter, Navy Joan — the one grandchild Joe and Jill Biden never seem to remember they have.

How did it all work? In some cases, the GOP report says, “Biden associates would receive significant deposits from foreign sources” and then “transfer smaller, incremental payments to Biden bank accounts.” The purpose of those myriad “complicated and seemingly unnecessary” transactions, Republicans concluded, was an “effort to conceal the source and total amount received from the foreign companies.”

According to Comer, “The bank records show the Biden family, their associates, and their companies received over $10 million from foreign nationals and their companies.”

Does The New York Times honestly expect us to believe all that laundering and racketeering has nothing to do with Joe Biden? Yes. We know because the Times left out the part of the GOP press conference where Comer said it is “inconceivable that the president did not know” about these payments.

Inconceivable indeed. Another part of the GOP’s report provided evidence that Biden’s presidential campaign “coordinated” with a former CIA official to craft that infamous letter signed by 51 former intelligence officials declaring Hunter Biden’s laptop to be Russian disinformation.

Former Deputy Director Michael Morell wrote the letter, working with Biden adviser and Hunter pal Antony Blinken, who is now secretary of state. Thanks to the GOP investigation, we know Morell admitted that his goal was to give Biden a debate “talking point” to rebut Trump. Meanwhile, former CIA senior adviser Nick Shapiro communicated about it via Biden campaign operative Andrew Bates, who now works at the White House.

Morell cloaked his motives in fighting for democracy, saying so in a “thank you” email to signatories revealed by yesterday’s GOP report. “I think this is the most important election since 1860 and 1864 when the very existence of the country was on the ballot,” Morrell opined. “Now, it is our democracy and the Constitution that are on the ballot. We all, of course, took an oath to ‘preserve, protect, and defend’ the Constitution. I think all of you did that yesterday by signing this letter.”

As we now know, there were at least 10 million rea$on$ for Biden’s campaign to suppress the laptop. As far as the intel community is concerned, however, the Constitution would be better served by telling the truth instead of peddling lies to protect a political candidate.

The Justice Department is no better. Merrick Garland sicced Special Counsel Jack Smith on Donald Trump over the classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Not only will he not do likewise for Biden’s own reckless mishandling of classified documents, there’s zero chance a special counsel will be appointed to look into the Biden Crime Family.

There are at least some journalists who find this troublesome. “There doesn’t seem to be any clean reason why all this money would be coming from Romania and China, passed through these shell companies in the pockets of members of the Biden family,” said Brit Hume. Yet “I wouldn’t be holding my breath waiting on any Justice Department indictments.”

As for the media, Jonathan Turley put it this way: “The Committee could produce eight heads in a duffle bag owned by Hunter and the media would still demand a luggage tag referencing the president. The question is what it takes to generate serious media interest in Biden influence peddling.”

Hey, just keep your eyes on that George Santos guy!