Secretary of State John Kerry told a packed meeting of skeptical House lawmakers on Wednesday that a vote against the Iran nuclear deal would be a vote to “go to war,” according to members leaving the meeting.

You know, considering the alternatives, I am really good with that. Accepting the offer on the table, gives me, and many, many others, acid indigestion because:

• Iran must already be close to completing the bomb. After all, it was over a year ago when Israel had determined that they were within a year of completing it. With the agreement’s limited inspections, Iran will soon complete any tweaking that is left to be done.

• Iran already is supporting the Palestinians and terrorists in Yemen, Lebanon, Iraq and elsewhere around the world. This agreement gives them access to billions of dollars to expand these terrorist activities.

• It is really hard to see anything that the U.S. or its Allies gain from this agreement, other than Obama’s strongly sought after World Peace Legacy Star to go along with his ObamaCare and Executive Immigration Order Legacy Stars.

The “war option” could be the best solution of all, if properly executed. America’s military strength is in our “shock and awe” technique, where we hit them with everything we have for 48 hours. During this time, we completely eliminate Iran’s nuclear footprint, along with their command and control capabilities, their major military facilities and personnel.

But then, we must learn from our past experiences. We are not very good at going in afterwards and cleaning up the mess. In fact, we should leave that to the Iranians. We could even invite ISIS to come in and fight it out with the Iranian militants for the desolated, non-nuclear wasteland. We could even build a wall around the territory to prevent them from escaping. However, this part of my solution may not be realistic, because we all know America is not good at building border fences.