By Sarah Holliday

Americans are in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is pitching artificial intelligence (AI) “companions” as the cure.

In a recent interview with Dwarkesh Patel, Zuckerberg laid out a vision where AI could fill the void of human connection, seamlessly blending into daily life. But critics, including Christian scholars, warn that this solution not only misunderstands the problem but exacerbates it. In fact, many argue that platforms like Facebook, which Zuckerberg himself built, have served as key culprits in driving social isolation.

Zuckerberg highlighted a sobering statistic: in a world where many crave at least 15 strong relationships, the average American has fewer than three people they consider friends. “The reality is that people just don’t have the connection,” he said, “and they feel more alone a lot of the time than they would like.” His solution? AI companions embedded in devices like Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses, designed to serve as emotional confidants, pseudo-therapists, or even stand-ins for romantic partners.

“The AI is there when you want it, but when you don’t, it’s like a great, good-looking pair of glasses that people like, and it kind of gets out of the way,” Zuckerberg explained. He envisions AI helping users navigate tough conversations, like conflicts with a partner or a boss, becoming “really compelling” as it learns their preferences and mimics human interaction.

Yet, this techno-utopian promise rings hollow for many, who see AI companionship not as a lifeline but as a chilling distortion of human relationships. It’s not just because the idea of robot friends is unsettling, but as some have argued, the very concept is an affront to what it means to be made in the image of God. On Friday’s “Washington Watch,” alongside guest host and former Congressman Jody Hice, Family Research Council’s Owen Strachan, senior fellow of the Center for Biblical Worldview, dismantled Zuckerberg’s proposal by arguing that it undermines the very essence of what it means to be human.

“There’s definitely an epidemic of loneliness,” Strachan declared, “but one of the reasons why there is an epidemic of loneliness is because of outlets like Facebook, which Zuckerberg famously created.” He pointed to a cultural shift over the past two decades, where “we’ve traded in investing in real-life friendship face-to-face for virtual engagement.” The result? “What we don’t need is more fake friends. We need more real friends.”

Hice agreed, stating that it’s important to “[come right] out of the gate [and explain] that Facebook itself has contributed to the epidemic of loneliness.” However, and “interestingly, [Zuckerberg’s] solution is artificial intelligence. Is that really an authentic potential replacement for human relationships?” The short answer, according to Strachan, is no.

He noted, “I’m sure that there are all sorts of ways technology can continue to help us to a limited degree in our life.” It certainly has its uses and benefits, Strachan stated. Yet, “as Christians, we have to say the Tower of Babel alone would tell us that you’ve got to watch technology carefully. There are limits to what it can do for you.” He warned, “When you start asking technology to replace the goods of personal interaction — corporate fellowship in a church or friendship with actual real life human people or a spouse or something like that — I think you may either be over the line or very near it.”

As Strachan put it, “The image of God means that we are fundamentally made by God for God’s glory, and we are made for relationship.” He pointed to Adam and Eve’s communion with God and each other as an example of this. “God is a personal God. He’s a personal being. He’s not a stone monolith in the sky,” Strachan stressed. This divine blueprint extends to human connections — husband and wife, parent and child, church family, and neighbors — where “loving your neighbor” is central to Christian life. AI, he argued, cannot replicate this sacred relational fabric.

Zuckerberg’s vision may be technologically dazzling, but as Strachan and Hice argued, it sidesteps a grim irony: the same platforms that fractured human connection are now peddling AI as the fix. Strachan and Hice, however, consider this use of AI a dangerous overreach, reducing profound human experiences to algorithms.

The question remains: will society embrace AI companions as a bandage for loneliness, or recommit to the messy, beautiful reality of human relationships? For those rooted in faith, as Strachan and Hice highlighted, the answer is clear: connection is not a product to be engineered but a divine gift to be cherished.

Sarah Holliday is a reporter at The Washington Stand.