Debra Saunders / June 4, 2009

Headcount Follies

If you see the federal government as a benign force that seeks only to make your life better, then the questions in the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey may not bother you. But if you have a smidgen of doubt, or if you value your privacy, you probably aren’t going to like some of Uncle Sam’s invasive queries.

Like: What is your race? Your personal ancestry or ethnic origin? How many rooms are in your home? Is anyone at home deaf or hard of hearing? Does anyone at home “because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition” have “serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions?”

Trouble walking or climbing stairs? Difficulty dressing or bathing? Or, “because of a physical, mental or emotional condition,” does anyone at your home have difficulty “doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping?”

All I could think of as I read the questionnaire – which is sent to some 250,000 addresses each month to keep census data current – was: Wait until talk radio gets a hold of this baby. These questions punch practically every hot button in the paranoid person’s arsenal (although the survey did not ask how often respondents have sex – which shows the Viagra lobby has its limits).

Listeners unhappy with President Obama’s expansion of federal power cannot be expected to savor opening the mail to find a questionnaire peppered with highly personal questions – and by the way, the U.S. Census Bureau says it is a federal crime not to respond. If you don’t answer, Uncle Sam can fine you up to $5,000. It’s as if the government is telling you: Trust us with your personal information. Or else.

They even tell you that you can’t put slashes, European style, through your 7s. There is some good news. “I’d come visit you in jail,” Chapman University law professor and GOP gubernatorial candidate Tom Campbell quipped when I called to ask him about the constitutional issues. “Courageous columnist goes to jail rather than have privacy invaded.”

Courageous? Not so fast, professor. As it turns out, this survey is not proof of Obama Overreach. The 2000 census asked essentially the same questions – on race, ancestry, even the physical, mental or emotional conditions.

Census Bureau public information officer Shelly Lowe wants you to know that while you may be reluctant to share personal information with a faceless form, the bureau has strict rules safeguarding individual privacy. Lowe called the bureau “the Fort Knox of data.” Any employee who for some reason broke the confidentiality rules could face jail time.

The purpose of the census is to aggregate data so Washington can figure out where to distribute your dollars, not to peek in your underwear drawer.

As for the “mandatory” answers and possible fine of up to $5,000 – to Lowe’s knowledge, no American ever has been fined, even though only 67 percent of Americans participated in the 2000 census. “We do not want to be in the enforcement business,” she told me.

That’s good to know because a lot of Americans don’t want to answer, for example, the race question. Campbell opined, “On the merits of it, I think we should have a colorblind society. I think asking people their race is repulsive.”

Then there’s the libertarian argument, voiced by Hoover Institution legal solon Richard Epstein: “If you’re a minimal-state (government) person, you don’t want the government to have money to run a set of programs that it should not run at all.”

The Constitution – Article 1, Sect. 2 – mandates an every-10-years census, but the language calls for an “enumeration” for drawing congressional districts – not a Facebook page. Yet even the first census taken in 1790 did not simply count heads; it differentiated between male and female, free and slave.

Some respondents list their race as “American” – a statement in itself. There’s an argument to be made that choosing not to answer keeps you out of the head count. Then you only hurt yourself and undercut your representation in Congress.

Alas, the Census Bureau does not help itself by making the long form so complicated. It’s supposed to be a headcount, not a headache.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

Start a conversation using these share links:

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!

★ PUBLIUS ★

“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2022 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.