Democrats' Move Toward Socialism Isn't Sitting Well With Their Base
Most would agree that since the election of Donald Trump, things have been crazier than ever, or at least crazier than they have been in recent memory. The Left regards Trump as whacko, even as its own policies push the boundaries of radicalism.
Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and even Hillary Clinton are still on scene, and they are joined with a cadre of faces new to the race for the Democrat nomination to oppose Trump.
Trump’s unconventional, non-politician, combative style has put off nearly everybody, and the inability of people to get beyond their personal feelings surely has gummed things up even more.
But somehow all of this has emboldened and set free the most radical among the Democrats, who push socialist ideals as if they are actually reasonable.
“The Democrats have become socialists,” stated liberal columnist Dana Milbank back in September 2017, less than a year after Trump took office.
“This became official, more or less … when [Bernie] Sanders rolled out his socialized health-care plan, Medicare for All, and he was supported by 16 of his Senate Democratic colleagues who signed on as co-sponsors, including the party’s rising stars and potential presidential candidates in 2020: Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, Kirsten Gillibrand.”
You may have seen the news since then that all of those people et al. have either declared their candidacy or hinted at it.
Sen. Harris, the former California attorney general, suggests doing away with private health insurance, replacing it with single-payer government health care.
She told CNN’s Jake Tapper that if people like their current health insurance, they would not be able to keep it. “Well, listen, the idea is that everyone gets access to medical care,” she said. “And you don’t have to go through the process of going through an insurance company, having them give you approval, going through the paperwork, all of the delay that may require.”
On its face, this actually sounds like a good move. But just ask many a military veteran how government health care has worked for them. And the idea that government health care would have less paperwork? Where does she think the mountains of existing paperwork had their origin?
But returning to Milbank’s 2017 column, he noted the dramatic shift since 2013, when “Sanders introduced similar legislation” and “he didn’t have a single co-sponsor.”
Democrats obviously believe this approach is their winning strategy and perhaps even believe it makes sense. The current environment among Democrats has allowed the emergence of a 29-year-old whippersnapper named Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to dislodge a longtime New York House member and quickly rise to fame. So fast and so prominently, in fact, that the old guard was knocked off balance, if balance it ever had.
These folks generally advocate doing away with ICE, open borders, single-payer health care/Medicare for All, doing away with private health insurance, abortion up to and even after birth, removing requirements for a photo ID to vote, allowing illegals to vote, radical gun control, raising taxes, free college education, and the Green New Deal.
The latter is one of Ocasio-Cortez’s favored positions. Somehow, despite her wild ideas and silly answers to serious questions, she has garnered a good bit of influence, enough to attract the attention of party leaders in Congress.
And liberal gadfly Michael Moore thinks so much of her that he wants the Constitution amended so that she can run for president.
“It’s too bad you have to be 35 to be president,” Moore said on MSNBC. “We put that in the Constitution, the Founding Fathers, because people died at 38 or 40 back then. Y'know, we need to lower that. If that was lowered to 30…” Obviously, logic is not Moore’s strong point.
These Democrat ideas have become so radical that one liberal Democrat, former Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, raised the flag of caution. “We’ve got to have actionable, practical ideas,” he said. “And I worry — we can’t get into this election season with everybody trying to out-promise one another.”
One survey shows that McAuliffe’s concerns are backed up by data. By a 53% to 40% margin, Democrat and Democrat-leaning registered voters responded to a Pew Research Center that they want their party to move to a more moderate position.
The number of Democrats who view their ever-more-socialist party favorably has fallen from 53% last September to 49% this year, and 47% viewed the party in a negative way.
Interestingly, the survey showed that 58% of Republicans seek a more conservative party, while 38% seek a more moderate party.
An editorial in Investor’s Business Daily puts things nicely into perspective: “Socialism is the most pernicious political system ever. Wherever it’s been tried, it’s led to mass misery, poverty, loss of rights, and even mass killing. Today, Venezuela, North Korea and Zimbabwe are notable examples. True American socialism wouldn’t be any better.”
Amen to that.