Guest Commentary / Jan. 21, 2021

Executive Orders: Not the Answer to Everything

What are executive orders, and when is it OK to use them?

By Leo Sopicki

President Joe Biden made a show on his first day in office of sitting at his desk and signing 17 executive orders. I heard one newsperson say that “His advisors told him he probably wouldn’t get all these things through Congress, so he might as well use executive orders.”

What? If that’s the case, then we don’t need Congress at all. No. That’s not how this self-government thing works.

Another press pundit was defending President Biden’s actions by saying that other presidents had signed many more executive orders on their first day. This “your guy signed more than my guy” argument, which was also invoked when Obama took over from Bush, is also irrelevant.

So, what are executive orders, and when is it OK to use them?


The issue is neither in the use or the number of executive orders but in how they are used.

You will not find the phrase “executive order” in the Constitution. The Constitution does say that the president “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” (Article 2, Sec. 3).

President George Washington issued the first executive order in 1789, directing department heads to provide reports about their operations. This was internal to the executive branch and thoroughly within his constitutional power.

At the other extreme, in 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued an executive order stipulating that all Japanese Americans be interned in camps. Was this wrong? Definitely.

Right or Wrong

For the sake of example, let’s say Congress passed a law mandating that a clown college be established in each of the 50 states within two years.

The president could issue an executive order directing that states with the lowest percentage of clown population be given priority in establishing the new colleges. He could determine which states get clown colleges the first year and which the second year.

This would not contradict the law that Congress passed, and the president would be taking care that “the Laws be faithfully executed.”

However, if the president issued an executive order saying that groups of states, for instance New England or the Dakotas, be served by one centrally located clown college, this would be an entirely different situation. This order would contradict what Congress specified in the law.

But, What If…

One might argue that there might be extenuating circumstances. What if there was not enough money allocated by Congress to pay for a clown college in each state? What if there are not enough certified clown instructors to staff 50 schools? Would this executive order be justified then?

No. If the president determines that insufficient funds or other conditions exist preventing establishing a clown college in every state, he would be obligated to return to Congress and ask for additional funding or a change in the law.

Of course, we know Congress would never establish clown colleges. There are more than enough clowns in Congress already.

In summary, executive orders are tools that the president uses to carry out the laws created by Congress, not a tool to create new laws or change laws passed by Congress. As citizens, we must be watchful that the president does not exceed his authority and remember that executive orders may be challenged in the courts.

LTC Leo P. Sopicki, U.S. Army (Ret.) is an Infantry and Psychological Operations veteran. His book, “Speak Truth to Patriots,” is available on Amazon.

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!


“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2021 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.