Publius / July 27, 2015

Wait — Iran Can Do What?

The more we learn the more we realize how good the deal is — for Iran.

The more we learn about the recent Iran nuclear deal the more we realize how good the deal is — for Iran. Team Obama has been working overtime telling us what a really, really good deal it is and why the only alternative is war. In testimony before Congress, Secretary of State John Kerry repeated that laughable claim, insisting the alternative “isn’t a better deal, some sort of unicorn arrangement involving Iran’s complete capitulation.” He argued, “That’s a fantasy, plain and simple.” No, what’s a fantasy is that this administration would do what’s best for America.

Oddly enough, at about the same time on the other side of the world Iranian President Hassan Rouhani was explaining to his government why lifting sanctions was all-important. Rouhani described the sanctions’ effect as having driven Iran’s economy down “to a Stone Age level.” He even went so far as to assert that his 2013 election was all about getting sanctions removed. Under those circumstances, with Iran under crushing economic pain and increasingly isolated politically, a reasonable person might conclude that the leverage in the Iran talks should have resided with the P-5+1, not with Iran. And yet Iran walked away with virtually all the concessions, including formal approval for an industrial-scale nuclear fuel cycle that will make it a threshold nuclear state in just 10 years’ time — with the world’s approval.

Next we learn that Iran will be allowed to control any sampling at the Parchin Weapons Complex, rather than the IAEA collecting the samples. The deal’s 24-day waiting period for IAEA access to nuclear sites is bad enough, but it defies belief that Iran itself would be allowed to control sampling at Parchin, where past military-related testing had been one of the major sticking points until Obama and Kerry waved their hands and said it no longer mattered. It matters enormously, and allowing the suspect to control what evidence is presented for review is incomprehensible.

It may also be a moot point, as Iran is yet again presenting a different understanding of the deal than the P-5+1. This time it’s Ali Akbar Salehi, Director of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, who on Friday denied that there is any agreement that allows sampling at Parchin: “The AEOI and the IAEA do not have any separate agreement on visiting the Parchin military site.” Salehi was backed by Ali Akbar Velayati, one of the Supreme Leader’s closest advisers, who said, “The access of inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) or from any other body to Iran’s military centers is forbidden.”

Reuel Marc Gerecht, senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, explains, “The IAEA’s efficiency declines in direct proportion to the deceptive hostility of the host country. Since the clerical regime has declined to confess its past weaponization research, we can be certain it will continue to treat the IAEA with deceptive animus, as it has since the mullahs’ clandestine nuclear handiwork was revealed by an Iranian opposition group in 2002.”

This is why access to military centers, especially those controlled by the Revolutionary Guard, should have been an inflexible demand during negotiations. If Iran can simply deny access to a suspect site on the grounds that it is a “military” installation, then the IAEA cannot possibly monitor Iran’s nuclear activities. Which, of course, is precisely the point for Iran.

The trouble is, as Gerecht notes, “According to the president, the IAEA can check any military facility inside the country. According to the supreme leader, we can’t. Somebody is lying.” How can we trust but verify Iran when we can’t even trust Obama?

Start a conversation using these share links:

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!

★ PUBLIUS ★

“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2022 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.