Nate Jackson / May 26, 2021

Can Harvard Keep Discriminating Against Asians?

The Supreme Court will decide whether to consider an admissions case.

Harvard University discriminates against Asian Americans on the basis of race. That much is pretty well established. The only question now is whether the Supreme Court will take up Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and follow the ancient (i.e., 2007) wisdom of Chief Justice John Roberts: “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.”

In order to admit more blacks and Hispanics, Harvard manipulates its admissions requirements in ways that limit admission rates for Asian American applicants in particular. This includes requiring higher SAT scores for Asian Americans, as well as penalizing them on an entirely subjective personality rating system. Astoundingly, since the suit was first filed in 2014, Harvard has won repeated victories in lower courts, more or less on the logic that it can continue to discriminate as long as it’s not too blatant about it. It’s what we’ve mockingly called the Not-Too-Blatant Standard™.

Students for Fair Admissions has appealed to the Supreme Court, which has yet to decide whether to take the case. Harvard, naturally, claims it doesn’t merit review because it’s just trying to increase diversity and equity.

On the contrary, given the justices’ inconsistency in previous race-based cases over the last four decades, it’s high time for some clarity.

In fact, it is the Court’s 2003 ruling in Grutter v. Bollinger that has given universities carte blanche to set up discriminatory regimes. Writing the Court’s opinion in that case, Sandra Day O'Connor infamously concluded, “We expect that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest [in student body diversity] approved today.” In other words, racial discrimination was justified for another quarter-century. We’re still seven years from reaching that arbitrary date.

On the surface, this case is only about Harvard. Yes, the particulars of the Harvard case are somewhat unique. Yes, the Roberts Court tends to rule narrowly on cases so as not to overreach with precedents. But thanks to the Left, race has become the defining issue in our nation, and dividing along racial lines is how leftists address almost literally everything. College admissions, law enforcement, corporate boards, airline pilots, professional sports, federal farm subsidies, job preferences, COVID vaccines — all of it has been racialized by the “Unity” Party.

As for the case at hand, the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal put it plainly: “The 14th Amendment guarantees equal protection of the law, and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act makes discrimination by race illegal. What the plaintiffs ask is for the Court to affirm, at long last, that these words mean what they say.”


Update 6/15: The Supreme Court has kicked this case down the road, asking the Biden administration to weigh in. Power Line’s Paul Mirengoff cuts right to the chase, writing: “There’s no doubt as to what the Biden Justice Department thinks about Harvard’s policy of granting extreme race-based preferences to Blacks and Latinos at the expense of Asian-Americans and Whites. Nor is there any doubt as to its view on whether this Court should grant the Asian students’ petition. Nor is the DOJ likely to think of any arguments in favor of preferences or denying cert that are unknown to the Justices. Thus, the Court’s request makes little sense to me unless the goal is to delay hearing the case until, at the earliest, the term following the 2022 elections. This, I believe, is the goal.”

Start a conversation using these share links:

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!

★ PUBLIUS ★

“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2021 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.