Publisher's Note: One of the most significant things you can do to promote Liberty is to support our mission. Please make your gift to the 2022 Independence Day Campaign today. Thank you! —Mark Alexander, Publisher

Emmy Griffin / April 27, 2022

The Praying Coach and the Supreme Court

Having been fired for praying after games, SCOTUS will determine if Joseph Kennedy’s termination was religious discrimination and a violation of free speech.

In the latest iteration of trying to excise prayer from schools, a former high school football coach was dragged before the highest court to defend his freedom of speech and expression. The case is Joseph Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, and opening arguments were heard on Monday.

Joseph Kennedy made a practice of praying at the 50-yard line after games. Sometimes students joined him, sometimes not. An opposing team took umbrage with this practice and brought it to the attention of school administrators, calling it “endorsement of a particular religion.” Kennedy was suspended and then fired after hiring lawyers to help him protect his First Amendment rights. The school argues that his drawing attention to himself in this manner was not protected speech because he was doing it in the capacity of a football coach and not as a private citizen and had caused a ruckus at a homecoming game.

The justices first need to determine whether Kennedy’s firing was based solely on his praying, which would be religious discrimination. Then they need to determine whether he was using this prayer time to coerce students or to give any favors to those who joined him, which would be tantamount to endorsement of a religion. They also want to determine where the lines are between being a coach at a public school and being a private citizen praying publicly.

According to The Washington Free Beacon: “The district did not cite the homecoming game in their suspension. Instead, the district points to midfield prayers at two October games where Kennedy prayed inconspicuously, without students.”

The case gets much stickier when it comes to determining whether Kennedy’s actions were coercion or free speech. Kennedy’s attorney, Paul Clement, pointed out that “a school does not endorse private religious speech just because it fails to censor it.”

Richard Katskee, a lawyer for Americans United for Separation of Church and State who is representing Bremerton School District, was adamant that Kennedy’s actions were attention-grabbing. Justice Brett Kavanaugh asked Katskee if it was attention-grabbing for a coach to cross himself at the beginning of a game, to which Katskee conceded it wasn’t as long as the coach didn’t draw attention to himself. Justice Kavanaugh then said, “I don’t know how we could write an opinion that would draw a line based on not making yourself the center of attention as the head coach of a game.”

Justice Sonya Sotomayor alternatively sided with Katskee with this “incisive” statement: “[Kennedy] is the one who chose to publicize his prayer. I don’t know of any other religion that requires you to get at the 50-yard line.”

Every athlete and coach of every religion who prays or crosses themselves or shows any religious inclinations publicly is open to court censure, according to Justice Sotomayor’s thoughtless statement. And there are plenty of examples of players and coaches who display their beliefs in public, like Tim Tebow, Mo Salah, and technically even Colin Kaepernick, should her “logic” be applied.

Justice Stephen Breyer pointed out that the real issue is the timing and location of the prayers, not necessarily the praying itself.

As far as free speech and free expression go, Coach Kennedy was praying silently. He never coerced students into joining him in prayer. He should be found not in violation of prayer in schools under previous cases like Engel v. Vitale, Pickering v. Board of Education, or Lemon v. Kurtzman.

The final ruling on this case will not come until June, but this presents an important opportunity. As Clement pointed out in his closing remarks, “At a certain point, the responsibility of the school is to teach the important lesson that private speech is protected even for teachers and coaches.”

Start a conversation using these share links:

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!

★ PUBLIUS ★

“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2022 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.