Who should young people adopt as role models? In the distant and long-gone past the role model would be someone admired, good at something desirable, and with impeccable character. But now in this second-decade of the 21st century, role models tend to be cool, footloose and fancy-free, not traditionally married, without apparent responsibilities, and looked up to and admired by peers and followers for their defiance of tradition, while fewer look down and frown upon those characteristics.

Why is the 4% LGBT homosexual community so uptight about thrusting themselves into the national spotlight, pushing against traditional one-man, one-woman marriage, while demanding respect for their own form of same-sex inclination including same-sex marriage? History shows that similar societies disintegrated as a result of mass acceptability of this form of behavior that could not stand the light of day.

Supposing there were no God, nature would demand godly type behavior to insure survival. The entire universe is subject to Laws of Nature, physics, natural law, laws of gravity, regularity and predictability of ocean tides, etc. Rotation of the earth causes predictable day and night. The earth rotates around the sun causing years and seasons, while the moon rotates around the earth every 28 days, in effect causing thirteen twenty-eight day biblical and business months. Those are but a smattering of immutable laws without which there would be chaos.

Physicist Albert Einstein (1879–1955) developed the general theory of relativity, one of the two pillars of modern physics, quantum mechanics and relativity, and stunned the scientific world with his famous equation “E=mc2” *(“E” representing units of energy; “m” representing units of mass; and “c2” which is the speed of light squared, or multiplied by itself).

Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727) formulated “The Three Laws of Motion,” the first and most commonly known being, “An object at rest will remain at rest, and an object in motion will remain in motion, at a constant velocity unless or until outside forces act upon it.”

It is obvious that there are laws guiding the universe, so why is there so much argument about laws guiding human nature and behavior? There are unwritten laws like the law of supply and demand translating into the less there is of something that is desired, the more expensive it gets; while the corollary states that the more there is of something, the cheaper it gets. The law of supply and demand and its manipulation form the basis for most business models.

“Evolution” technically means change and in the spirit of evolutionists, their interpretation is “A gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form.” That concept of evolution is a law that never quite made it, and as it sounds good in principle, it is in defiance of the reality that were creative evolution to be absolutely true, it would continue on ad infinitum, but there is no proof that all species evolved from the same gooey mass in the slime of the earth.

Charles Darwin is famous for the theory of evolution by means of natural selection, basically the survival of the fittest and when members of a population die they are replaced by the progeny better suited to survive in the environment in which natural selection took place. Darwin’s theory holds up when species are improved but breaks down when it holds that NEW SPECIES come from the ancestors, when in fact only new forms of the same species can come about.

If the theory of creative evolution were to be true, there would be no need for two sexes, but throughout nature, there are male and female, absolute necessities for reproduction and survival of the species. Therefore it is obvious that male and female are specifically designed for and required for production of progeny. Use of sex contrary to natural design must therefore be deemed to be unnatural.

There is controversy about certain forms of the verb “pervert,” which is to alter something from its original purpose, while the noun “pervert” refers to someone who  distorts or corrupts what was intended, or in the case of sex, someone whose sexual behavior is counter to that designed and intended by nature, sexual behavior contrary to natural law, and therefore deemed to be abnormal and considered by many to be unacceptable.

The premise of political correctness perverts the word “correct” making it conform to a belief that language which could offend sensibilities, particularly in matters of sex, should be eliminated, as they are offensive to those deviating from natural law defining male and female functions. “Correct” is absolutely correct, whereas “Politically Correct” glosses over an issue but is not necessarily actually correct.

Political correctness is actually a lie, but it is important not to intentionally hurt or disparage people with words. However, there is truth in the saying, “Tell it like it is,” but no one wants to hear that.