Part of our core mission?

Exposing the Left's blatant hypocrisy. Help us continue the fight and support the 2020 Year-End Campaign now.

Terence Jeffrey / Oct. 11, 2017

New Regulations Maintain Obama's Abortion-Inducing Drug Mandate

Question: Do the new conscience-protection regulations the administration released last week maintain or rescind President Barack Obama's regulatory mandate that health insurance plans provide co-pay-free coverage for sterilizations and all Food and Drug Administration-approved contraceptives — which include abortion-inducing drugs and devices?

Question: Do the new conscience-protection regulations the administration released last week maintain or rescind President Barack Obama’s regulatory mandate that health insurance plans provide co-pay-free coverage for sterilizations and all Food and Drug Administration-approved contraceptives — which include abortion-inducing drugs and devices?

Answer: They maintain it.

Despite offering broad exemptions for people and institutions that have religious or moral objections to this coverage, the new regulations maintain Obama’s mandate.

Thus, the government will still force most insurance plans to cover these things, and — given that Obamacare forces taxpayers to subsidize insurance premiums for people with incomes under 400 percent of the federal poverty level — it will still force taxpayers, regardless of their own moral or religious beliefs, to underwrite this coverage for others.

Our government is still saying: We will confiscate your hard-earned income to pay for someone else’s chemical abortion.

Seven years ago, a Democrat-controlled Congress and White House did not believe they could get away with writing an explicit mandate for sterilizations, contraceptives and abortifacients into the Obamacare law.

Today, a Republican administration — governing with a Republican Congress — has failed to use its lawful authority to simply rescind the regulation Obama issued to force this coverage into insurance plans.

The Affordable Care Act included general language empowering a division of the Department of Health and Human Services to recommend the “additional preventive care and screenings” for women that should be mandated in health insurance plans.

This legislative language did not mandate coverage of sterilizations, contraceptives or abortifacients.

The two new conscience-protection regulations the administration issued last week did correctly interpret this aspect of the law.

“The Congress did not specify any particular additional preventive care and screenings with respect to women that HRSA could or should include in its guidelines, nor did Congress indicate whether the guidelines should include contraception and sterilization,” the regulation granting religious objectors an exemption from the mandate observed.

In 2011, when HHS issued its regulation requiring all non-grandfathered health plans to cover sterilizations, contraceptives and abortion-inducing drugs and devices, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops called for this entire mandate to be reversed.

In comments on the regulation written by its lawyers, the USCCB noted that Congress had never been able to enact through the legislative process what the Obama administration was forcing on the nation by administrative edict.

“Until now, no federal law of any kind, or at any time, has required private health insurance plans to cover contraceptives or sterilization,” said the USCCB. “Efforts to pass such a law in Congress have persistently failed.”

The right remedy? Kill the entire sterilization-contraception-abortifacient mandate.

“In sum, we urge HHS to rescind the mandate in its entirety,” said the bishops. “Only rescission will eliminate all the serious moral problems the mandate creates; only rescission will correct HHS’s legally flawed interpretation of the term ‘preventive services.’”

Rather than rescind the regulation, Obama engaged in years of litigation, seeking to enforce it even on individuals and institutions that had moral and religious objections.

The day President Donald Trump was inaugurated, he signed an executive order seeking to roll back enforcement of Obamacare as far as possible through executive authority.

“It is the policy of my administration to seek the prompt repeal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” Trump said in his order.

“To the maximum extent permitted by law,” Trump continued, “the secretary of Health and Human Services … and the heads of all other executive departments and agencies … with authorities and responsibilities under the Act shall exercise all authority and discretion available to them to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision or requirement of the act that would impose a fiscal burden on any State or a cost, fee, tax, penalty, or regulatory burden on individuals, families, healthcare providers, health insurers, patients, recipients of healthcare services, purchasers of health insurance, or makers of medical devices, products, or medications.”

It would have made perfect sense under this order for HHS “to waive” in its entirety Obama’s sterilization-contraception-abortifacient mandate — while Trump worked with a Republican Congress to repeal the Obamacare law that never required that mandate in the first place.

Instead, the administration has maintained Obama’s mandate and issued two regulations — which together are 263 pages — exempting individuals and institutions that have religious or moral objections to some or all of the surgeries, devices and drugs it requires.

HHS has put out a press release boasting about the small impact these new regulations will have on carrying out Obama’s surviving mandate.

“The regulation leaves in place preventive services coverage guidelines where no religious or moral objection exists — meaning that out of millions of employers in the U.S., these exemptions may impact only about 200 entities, the number that filed lawsuits based on religious or moral objections,” says Trump’s HHS. “These rules will not affect over 99.9 percent of the 165 million women in the United States.”

HHS did not calculate how many newly conceived human beings will perish in the coming years as a result of the Trump administration maintaining Obama’s mandate.


Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!


“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2020 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.