‘Oh, How Do I Hate Thee, Donald Trump? Let Me Count the Ways…’
Donald Trump is a different thing to different people. And exactly what he is depends entirely upon one’s general liking or disliking of him.
Donald Trump is a different thing to different people. And exactly what he is depends entirely upon one’s general liking or disliking of him.
Since he had the gall to win the nomination over several mainstream Republican candidates, and then dared to defeat “she who must be elected” — it was her turn, you know — he has been persona non grata to everyone on the Left, many in the center, and more than a few on the Right.
He believes in saying what he thinks, and those comments usually aren’t polite. Of course, saying inflammatory things is a Trump trademark, and anyone who criticizes him must be prepared for a counterattack, which is inevitably harsher than the original barb. Even a mild criticism brings a strong retort.
This penchant for strong responses contributed to the high level of dislike that even some of those who share political and ideological positions with him felt, and still feel.
Of the several things about him that people dislike, his caustic manner may top the list. As a result of this trait, much of the negative reactions are of a personal nature, rather than a substantive nature. Like-minded Republicans also dislike Trump for his manner.
They agree with him, for example, on lowering taxes so that Americans keep more of their earnings; doing away with economy-slowing regulations to promote job creation; wanting stronger border security to lessen the many negatives that accompany the way-too-high number of illegal aliens in the country; expecting our allies to assume more of the cost of their own national security, and other very sensible things. But they still don’t like him.
All of these individual dislikes add up to one major issue: Donald Trump is cut from a different mold. He is not like those of the Washington establishment. He doesn’t think like they do, talk like they do, or behave like they do. And that, it turns out, is his greatest sin: “He’s not one of us.”
When someone does things differently, others object. They don’t want to have to adapt to something different. That’s hard work. They like things as they are.
Imagine baseball as a game that consists, at all levels, only of right-handed players. Then along comes a left-handed pitcher. All the hitters have to adapt. Even the guy’s own catcher has to adapt. The motion on the mound is different. Curve balls curve a different way.
Chaos! Who wants to have to adapt to that?
Outside observers say, “So what’s the big deal?” But to the establishment, it doesn’t matter how good the guy is, how many strikeouts he collects, how few runs the opponents score. The players are focused only on the fact that he doesn’t fit into their way of doing things.
Trump is that southpaw. He an outsider, an invader, and he has caused chaos. Therefore, he must be opposed. He cannot be allowed to succeed. Even the good that he does must be opposed, lest there be others like him that will follow him and destroy their happy home.
And the establishment of elected and hired hands — The Swamp — has decided that he must be impeached or otherwise removed from the office to which the American people elected him. “Nothing will stand in our way; Trump must be removed at all costs!” is the new dictum.
The “Get Trump” faction includes elements of the American news media, including beat reporters, editors, news directors, producers, publishers, and owners.
Stories he just doesn’t like, or that actually fail the accuracy test, as many do, are labeled “fake news.” News outlets indulging in the aforementioned are criticized, such as “the failing New York Times.” Trump also refers to some outlets and personnel as “the enemy of the people.”
His frequent criticisms produce reactions from the media, such as that he is challenging the freedom of the press. That, of course, is a fundamental element of our nation guaranteed by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. And the charge is often accepted as truth without question or even fact-checking.
Media personalities are quick to raise this as an important and dangerous act previously unheard of in all of our history. They have, however, so far neglected much actual history that runs contrary to their narrative. This may be because they, themselves, do not know the truth of that allegation, or it may be because it is an inconvenient truth.
But best-selling author Mark Levin, in chapter four of his fantastic new book Unfreedom of the Press, details actions by five former presidents that actually did attack press freedoms.
These attacks started way back with John Adams and include presidents Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, and, yes, Barack Obama.
There is not room here to detail those activities, but Levin shows quite clearly that nothing Trump has done even approaches the attacks on press freedom imposed by those five. In fact, Trump’s criticisms are child’s play in comparison.
The information is there for all to see, if any are interested in the truth. But many, perhaps most, won’t go to the trouble.