Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg told an audience there wouldn’t be so much opposition to abortion and contraception if the benevolent SCOTUS gave the right for women to have an abortion a bit differently. That isn’t how a Supreme Court Justice should operate, but it doesn’t stop Notorious RBG – as she has been dubbed by her feminazi fans. Cosmopolitan Magazine recorded the highlights of a speech where she said, “I think if the court had gone step-by-step as we did in the gender equality cases, the court and the public would have reacted in a more positive way than it did. It established a target. Roe v. Wade, that case name is probably the best-known case of the second half of the 20th century. And a movement focused on ending access to abortion for women grew up, flourished, around that one target. Nine unelected judges decided that one issue for the nation.” Strange as it may be, Ginsburg is exactly right – judicial activism often creates a backlash, and it undeniably did in this case. That’s why the pro-life movement is fighting back – in her words – “step-by-step.” More…

(Hat tip for the shirt: spreadshirt.com)