Mark Alexander / May 19, 2000

The Clinton Gun Confiscators

As we anticipated, now that the Million (plus or minus 900,000 or so) Mom March is over, the queen mother (Ms. Donna Dees Thomases, sister-in-law of HILLARY! confidante Susan Thomases and former publicist for CBS anchorman Dan Rather) announced that she was converting what was, ostensibly, a gun safety movement, into a political action committee to advance the Sociocrats’ “gun control” agenda.

Supporting his political operative’s “gun safety” appeal, Bill Clinton proclaimed, “Forget about the crimes, just look at the accidental gun rate.”

Memo to Bill: We did, and in 1999, fewer people died in gun-related accidents than in any year since 1913, even though the population – and number of guns – are now many times that of 1913.

The Sociocrats’ agenda is not, of course, about crime or gun safety. It is about gun registration and confiscation. “Our police are hampered by the lack of full gun registration,” claims Clinton.

In addition to the “gun safety” smokescreen, the Clintonistas and their media sycophants would also have the public believe that the Second Amendment is about “hunting and sporting” interests. “Hadn’t anybody missed a day of deer season on what I’ve done – nobody. And nobody’s been knocked out of one sporting contest for what I’ve advocated,” said Clinton after Congress passed his last round of legislation authorizing incremental federal encroachment to control the legal acquisition of guns by law-abiding citizens.

Contrary to the soundbites about hunting and target shooting, the Second Amendment does not concern itself with such mundane matters. It is expressly a prohibition against government encroachment on our natural rights to protect ourselves, as made clear by our Founders, against tyranny.

Henry St. George Tucker, in Blackstone’s authoritative 1768 “Commentaries on the Laws of England,” makes this natural right clear: “The right of self-defense is the first law of nature; in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and when the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.”

To wit: “One man with a gun can control 100 without one. … Make mass searches and hold executions for found arms,” ordered V.I. Lenin. Millions died. “If the opposition disarms, well and good. If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves,” proclaimed Joseph Stalin. Millions more died.

Only the most nescient historical observer would claim that the “New Democrat” breed of Sociocrats is somehow devoid of the capacity to produce, in a near future generation, the likes of another Lenin or Stalin. Such ignorance would most certainly condemn one’s children and grandchildren to the same fate.

As for well-intentioned mothers and members of Congress, Alexander Hamilton, in the Federalist Papers #78, the definitive exposition on the limits of the U.S. Constitution, stated, “No legislative act contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. … A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute.”

Accordingly, Chief Justice William Rehnquist decreed in a court decision just this week that under our Constitution, the Founders authorized Congress to act only within limited, enumerated powers.

As for The Federalist’s allocation of editorial space to this issue, we must agree with another Justice, Joseph Story (appointed by James Madison), that the Second Amendment is “the palladium of the liberties of the republic” without which, the Constitution is irrelevant.

Start a conversation using these share links:

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!

★ PUBLIUS ★

“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2022 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.