Douglas Andrews / May 10, 2022

The Left Wrecks the English Language

Proponents of silly terms such as “pregnant people” and “birthing persons” are only asking to be mocked.

“Y'know,” said author and conservative commentator Andrew Klavan, “the news of the week can be difficult to understand if we look at it from only one side.”

True enough, we’d say — especially if we, like Klavan, “fail to consider the ideas of left-wingers simply because they’re violent, baby-killing pervert groomers who lie about everything and then try to silence the truth to keep themselves from being found out.”

Still, we don’t feel any less perspicacious today despite having missed the rationale from the Associated Press for saying “pregnant person” instead of abiding by the term that’s been used endlessly around the globe, across cultures, and down through the millennia without a single exception: pregnant woman.

Because, after all, there are two sexes: male and female. Those with XY chromosome pairs and those with XX chromosome pairs. And even though we’re no more a biologist than Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, we know with every fiber of our being that only females can become pregnant and give birth to babies.

So: pregnant woman, not pregnant person.

And yet, here we are, with the once serious and highly regarded Associated Press making a mockery of the English language. As Fox News reports:

The AP Style Guide recently made an update to its inclusive language protocols, adding the phrase “pregnant people” to cover trans or nonbinary people who can get pregnant but don’t identify as women. On Wednesday, Associated Press reporter Kimberlee Kruesi — who announces her pronouns in her Twitter bio — alerted Twitter to the new guidance. She tweeted, “New AP style guidance alert” and shared a screenshot of the update. The entry gave a newly defined usage for the phrase “pregnant people,” and also included instructions on usage for the phrase “people who seek an abortion.”

Of course, it can’t end with “pregnant people.” Or to put it another way, the AP can’t become partially pregnant. So if its style guide makes an accommodation for “pregnant people,” it must also accommodate terms like “people who seek an abortion” and “birthing person,” which, as Klavan says, those on the Left insist on “in order for their fantasy lives to continue undisturbed.” He continues: “They even issued emojis of a pregnant man, with which they could decorate their text messages, so that they could be used later in a court of law to bolster their insanity defense.”

As you might imagine, though, this language fluidity also creates inconsistencies — such as when its practitioners, having insisted that men can become pregnant, are then forced to insist that men cannot become pregnant in order to restrict them from rendering an opinion on abortion cases being adjudicated before the Supreme Court.

Here, it seems that resistance and mockery are called for, because those who control the language have inordinate power over those who don’t. Take those in government, for example. As The Daily Signal reports, “A division of the Labor Department charged with overseeing benefits for American workers is telling employees to use the words ‘they,’ ‘them,’ and ‘their’ to describe individuals as part of ‘Gender-Inclusive Language Policy.’”

Since when are “they,” “them,” and “their” singular pronouns? Well, since the Employee Benefits Security Administration issued a memo insisting that its policy conforms with President Joe Biden’s executive order regarding dignity for federal employees “no matter their gender identity or sexual orientation.”

Call us a sentimental schmuck, but words have meaning. And one doesn’t treat others “with dignity” by condescending to them, nor by taking a wrecking ball to the English language on behalf of them. And we mean “them” in the standard plural sense.

Start a conversation using these share links:

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!

★ PUBLIUS ★

“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2022 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.