Political Editors / May 27, 2022

In Brief: U.S. Army — ‘Equitable’ and Unready

The Army has exchanged its science-based, gender-neutral combat fitness test for a watered-down test, with different standards for men and women.

As we prepare to observe Memorial Day, honoring those who made the ultimate sacrifice in serving our nation’s Armed Forces, it’s worth considering the state of our military today. Thomas W. Spoehr, a retired Army lieutenant general and director of the Center for National Defense at The Heritage Foundation, does just that by evaluating U.S. Army fitness standards.

Americans are used to picturing Army combat soldiers as incredibly tough individuals, able to run faster and do more pushups than most people. In today’s Army, though, that notion is officially passé.

At a recent Senate hearing, we learned that Army physical fitness has been sacrificed on the altar of gender equity, a move that former infantryman Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., noted will “get soldiers killed.”

Army Secretary Christine Wormuth admitted to Cotton that the service had abandoned efforts to ensure that soldiers’ fitness in physically demanding Army career fields — such as artillery — was being continuously assessed to ensure they met the standards. A subsequent exchange revealed that the Army’s minimum fitness standards have been dramatically compromised.

Years ago under Barack Obama, when Secretary of Defense Ash Carter allowed women into all combat positions, Carter and others assured us that readiness would not be compromised. It was a lie at the time, and we know even more now.

Because, as Spoehr notes, “not all Army career fields require the same levels of physical fitness,” the military needed standards to ensure that “soldiers have abilities necessary for their career fields.”

Enter the Army’s new combat fitness test. Designed over 10 years, it consists of six events, all chosen as a proxy for the types of strength soldiers need on the modern battlefield. The standards were gender-neutral to objectively assess who could serve in which Army positions.

The Army spent years studying the standards necessary to succeed in its 190 different career fields.

Unlike previous fitness tests, the Army combat fitness test had no categories for male and female. Color-coded scoring bands were established for each of the six Army combat fitness test events. For artillery crew members, the level of performance required were the highest, coded “black.”

The standards were intense and difficult even for many men to reach. That’s the point. But just as implementation was about to happen, “Congress and advocacy groups intervened.”

Alarmed that women were scoring lower than men were on trial tests of the Army combat fitness test, Congress passed a law delaying the test and requiring an independent assessment.

Months later, Rand, who performed the study, returned with shocking news: Males and females score differently on fitness tests. Thus, greater numbers of women than men would not be eligible to serve and remain in the Army’s most physically demanding career fields.

Under heavy pressure, the Army surrendered. It threw out the gender-neutral test, effectively abandoning any effort to link continued physical fitness to career fields and simultaneously watering down the baseline fitness standards.

The Army went further, easing requirements for men and women. Wormuth says the aim is to ensure fairness: “We didn’t want to disadvantage any subgroups.” But as Spoehr argues:

So now the entire Army is disadvantaged, its readiness degraded in the name of “fairness.” The desire to put “equitable” outcomes first is reducing elite combat units to the lowest common denominator. It is a recipe for defeat.

Read the whole thing here.

Start a conversation using these share links:

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!

★ PUBLIUS ★

“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2022 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.