In Brief: The Censorship-Industrial Complex
Trump Derangement led to efforts to control the information available to you on every topic.
We’ve written at length about the censorship now rampant in Big Tech and Big Media, as well as even some trials in Big Government. Legal analyst Margot Cleveland explains how “the Censorship Complex” is much like the “military-industrial complex” Dwight Eisenhower warned us to avoid.
The Biden administration may have abandoned plans to create a “Disinformation Board,” but a more insidious “Censorship Complex” already exists and is growing at an alarming speed.
This Censorship Complex is bigger than banned Twitter accounts or Democrats’ propensity for groupthink. Its funding and collaboration implicate the government, academia, tech giants, nonprofits, politicians, social media, and the legacy press. Under the guise of combatting so-called misinformation, disinformation, and mal-information, these groups seek to silence speech that threatens the far-left’s ability to control the conversation — and thus the country and the world.
People are beginning to understand this threat, as evidenced by the Twitter Files and other news, but “Americans have no idea of the breadth and depth of the ‘Censorship Complex’ — and how much it threatens the fabric of this country.”
In his farewell address in 1961, President Dwight D. Eisenhower cautioned against the “potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power” via the new sweeping military-industrial complex. Its “total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — [was] felt in every city, every statehouse, every office of the federal government.” Replace “military-industrial” with “censorship,” and you arrive at the reality Americans face today.
Cleveland points to Donald Trump’s victory in 2016 as the trigger for the sweeping changes we now see. He used social media to get around the corporate media, and “the left was terrified.”
Of course, Democrats and the media couldn’t admit their previous control over information converted to electoral victories and that for their own self-preservation, they needed to suppress other voices. So instead, the left began pushing the narrative that “disinformation” — including Russian disinformation — from alternative news outlets and social media companies handed Trump the election.
Cleveland recounts some well-worn history about Trump, Hillary Clinton, Russia, the FBI, and so on to make a broader point about government collusion in censorship:
Together, the State Department and the many intelligence agencies behind the FITF worked not just with Twitter but with the array of tech giants, such as Google and Facebook, pushing for censorship of supposed mis-, dis-, and mal-information. But the deep state was not alone. The “disinformation” contagion also reached the Hill, nonprofits, think tanks, and academic institutions with both politics and a desire to suckle at the federal teat driving a frenzied expansion of the project. Together these groups pushed for even more silencing of their opponents, and the Censorship Complex boomed.
The danger Eisenhower warned the country of in 1961 is mild in comparison to the threat of the Censorship Complex. Unlike the military-industrial complex that reached only one function of the federal government, the Censorship Complex affects all aspects of governance, controlling the information available to you and your fellow Americans on every topic.
- Tags:
- Margot Cleveland