Fellow Patriot:

The voluntary financial generosity of Patriots — people like you — keeps our doors open. Please support the 2020 Year-End Campaign today. Thank you for your support! —Nate Jackson, Managing Editor

Terence Jeffrey / Nov. 22, 2017

The Thanksgiving Day Game That Defined American Football

A group of students from Harvard, Yale, Princeton and Columbia met at the Fifth Avenue Hotel in New York City on April 28, 1882 and made an unambiguous decision: The United States was declaring its independence from British football.

A group of students from Harvard, Yale, Princeton and Columbia met at the Fifth Avenue Hotel in New York City on April 28, 1882 and made an unambiguous decision: The United States was declaring its independence from British football.

“A proposition to adopt the English rugby rules was unanimously rejected,” the New York Daily Tribune reported on May 1, 1882.

The basic concept at the foundation of American football originated in ancient Greece but came to the United States through Britain.

As early as the 12th century, the English were playing “football” games — particularly on Shrove Tuesday.

William Fitz-Stephen wrote a biography of his friend, St. Thomas Becket, which he introduced with a description of London that celebrated the local custom of playing football on the day before Lent.

“After dinner,” Fitz-Stephen wrote, according to a 1772 translation from the original Latin, “all the youth of the city go into the field of the suburbs, and address themselves to the famous game of football.”

But Col. Alexander Weyand, who captained Amy in 1915, described in his 1955 book, “The Saga of American Football,” how American colleges started out playing a game that was neither the English game of soccer nor the English game of rugby.

Yet, they then turned to soccer, and then to rugby, and then created an entirely new and completely American game.

When Princeton and Rutgers played the first game in 1869, he wrote, it “conformed to no recognized European code of rules.”

But then, in 1873, students from Princeton, Columbia, Rutgers and Yale — but not Harvard — met in New York and adopted rules that Weyand described as “essentially similar” to soccer.

The next year, Harvard played McGill under Canadian rugby rules.

In 1876, Princeton called a meeting with Harvard, Yale and Columbia, which the late Delaware coach David M. Nelson described in his book, “Anatomy of a Game.” It was attended by “only eight students.”

They created the Intercollegiate Football Association, Nelson reported, and adopted rugby rules.

But Princeton’s legalistic mastering of these rules — particularly in its games with Yale — would soon drive the same schools that had voted to adopt the rugby-style game to abandon it.

On Thanksgiving 1878, Princeton beat Yale and claimed the championship. In 1879, Princeton and Yale tied 0-0, and the association let Princeton retain its championship.

Weyand quoted The New York Times expressing its disgust in the wake of this game: “For nearly ten minutes the men struggled without gaining ten feet either way, the ‘backs’ of each side being nothing but interested onlookers.”

In 1880, Yale’s Walter Camp suggested a new rule that would abolish the rugby scrummage. Instead, a team would be given undisputed possession of the ball, which a center could snap back to a quarterback with his foot.

These rules, however, would not penalize a team for taking a safety.

In the 1880 Princeton-Yale game, the Tigers played for another 0-0 tie, taking 11 unscored safeties.

Now, Weyand reported, Camp succeeded in rule changes that added as many as two overtime periods to a tied game and held that “the side which makes four or more safeties less than their opponents shall win the game.”

But while now penalizing safeties, the rules did not penalize a “touch-in-goal” — which involved throwing the ball to a player in the area behind your own goal line but outside the side line. When teams did this, they got the ball back at the 25-yard line.

In the 1881 Princeton-Yale game, played at the Polo Grounds in Manhattan, Princeton used the touch-in-goal to retain possession for most of the first half. Yale similarly stalled in the second.

“In an extra inning,” Weyand wrote, “Princeton kept possession of the ball until darkness terminated the farce.” It was another 0-0 tie.

A group of British expatriates then started a movement to kill America’s nascent effort to form its own brand of football.

These British players, including one E.H. Moeran, met Walter Camp of Yale and representatives from Princeton and Harvard at Delmonico’s restaurant on April 8, 1882.

“Mr. Moeran, who presided, said that he had only seen two games in this country, and if those were a sample of the way in which the games were to be played it would be better to crush football in its infancy,” The New York Times reported the next day. “He asked the Americans to adopt the Rugby rules, but the Americans, speaking from practical experience, disagreed with him.”

Three weeks later, the association unanimously rejected returning to the rugby rules. But they did accept another change suggested by Camp that required the team in possession of the ball to get five yards (or lose 10) in three plays or surrender possession.

That Thanksgiving, Princeton and Yale played again at the Polo Grounds. It was not a tie. Yale was leading with little time left — but then Princeton mounted a final drive.

“Yale made a magnificent stand on the three-yard line, but the ball was pushed over,” reported a history of Princeton athletics published in 1901. “But the referee was not sure whose hands were on the ball when it crossed the line, and refused to give Princeton the touchdown!”

They gave Yale the victory.

More than a century later, the NCAA introduced instant replay — which could have determined who really won that game.

COPYRIGHT 2017 CREATORS.COM

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!

★ PUBLIUS ★

“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2020 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.