April 29, 2024

SCOTUS Weighs Presidential Immunity

During oral arguments on Thursday, some justices made it clear that the case transcends Donald Trump’s actions in the aftermath of the 2020 election.

Neil Gorsuch was the definitive jurist at last Thursday’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court — but only because he first announced that he wasn’t interested in the particular case before him.

“I’m not concerned about this case,” said Donald Trump’s first Supreme Court appointment, “but I am concerned about future uses of the criminal law to target political opponents based on accusations about their motives.”

For good measure, Gorsuch added, “We’re writing a rule for the ages.”

Indeed, they are. Whether Gorsuch really couldn’t care less about ruling on Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election — an election that seems more rigged, more rotten, and more disastrously consequential with each passing day — is perhaps dubious. How could he not be interested in an election that so roiled the nation, an election that more than a third of Americans believe was illegitimate?

What matters is that Gorsuch’s statement about the long-term consequences of presidential immunity set the tone for the day’s proceedings. It ennobled the justices’ line of inquiry by making clear that the real issue wasn’t Donald Trump but the American presidency writ large and for the lifespan of the American republic.

“As you’ve indicated,” said Justice Brett Kavanaugh, “this case has huge implications for the presidency, for the future of the presidency, for the future of the country.”

As for the arguments in this case, their merits might be boiled down to this: It’s the extremism, stupid. By that, I mean that both the Biden position and the Trump position are fairly wing-nutty. No rational observer believes a U.S. president should be entirely above the law — that, for example, he should be allowed to rig an election or falsify a FISA warrant and thereby spy on his political rivals. Oh, wait. But nor do thoughtful observers believe a president should spend his time in office looking over his shoulder, intimidated into inaction by the prospect of a vile, petty, vindictive, hyper-partisan successor hell-bent on raiding his home, snooping through his wife’s underwear drawer, and prosecuting him for matters that a more decent man would, out of respect for the office and the enormity of its responsibilities, refuse to pursue legally except as a last, last, last resort.

Special persecutor Jack Smith and Biden counsel Michael Dreeben got a taste of where things were headed at the adult table early on. As the Wall Street Journal editorial board put it: “Chief Justice John Roberts was especially scathing about the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that a President has no immunity. That opinion argued — and Mr. Dreeben defended it — that ‘a former President can be prosecuted because he’s being prosecuted,’ said the Chief.”

Not only does the DC Circuit’s rationale ignore the fact that presidents are somewhat special people and that the decisions they must make are unlike those of any other American citizen, but it also argues that Trump may be prosecuted because Trump is being prosecuted. With apologies to Winston Churchill, that’s a tautology posing as a circularity wrapped inside a redundancy.

Trust us. We’re the government. That’s the insulting argument Smith, Dreeben, and their ilk are making before the Supreme Court.

What we have here is the criminalization of politics and the criminalization of electoral due process. Only when Trump tries to exercise his constitutional right to dispute the results of an election is it “a threat to our democracy.” Only when Trump’s legal team organizes a second set of electors in disputed states is it considered obstruction of justice rather than due process. Only when Trump asks a state-level election official to disqualify illegitimate votes — not create more votes — is it a crime.

As Power Line’s John Hinderaker notes: “The Supreme Court justices no doubt care about the future prospect of either 1) lawless presidents or 2) a cycle of meritless prosecution of presidents once they leave office. (And believe me, when Joe Biden leaves office I hope Republicans can find a way to bring multiple criminal prosecutions against him.) But Jack Smith cares only about getting a conviction between now and November, however flimsy his theory may be.”

This is an unprecedented case: A sitting or former president has never been before the Supreme Court for a matter of criminal immunity. Based on the questioning of all nine justices, it’s highly likely the High Court will find some sort of middle ground and return the case to a lower court, which will need weeks, if not months, of additional fact-finding. And that means that this case isn’t going to go to trial before November’s election.

Sorry, Jack.

In the end, the Trump team’s argument about the horrors that could result if future presidents from both parties weren’t afforded some degree of immunity for their actions in office clearly resonated with the justices. That’s what happened in this hearing, and it was a blow to the Democrats’ ongoing efforts to criminalize our political differences.

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!


The Patriot Post and Patriot Foundation Trust, in keeping with our Military Mission of Service to our uniformed service members and veterans, are proud to support and promote the National Medal of Honor Heritage Center, the Congressional Medal of Honor Society, both the Honoring the Sacrifice and Warrior Freedom Service Dogs aiding wounded veterans, the National Veterans Entrepreneurship Program, the Folds of Honor outreach, and Officer Christian Fellowship, the Air University Foundation, and Naval War College Foundation, and the Naval Aviation Museum Foundation. "Greater love has no one than this, to lay down one's life for his friends." (John 15:13)

★ PUBLIUS ★

“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

Please join us in prayer for our nation — that righteous leaders would rise and prevail and we would be united as Americans. Pray also for the protection of our Military Patriots, Veterans, First Responders, and their families. Please lift up your Patriot team and our mission to support and defend our Republic's Founding Principle of Liberty, that the fires of freedom would be ignited in the hearts and minds of our countrymen.

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2024 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.