Fellow Patriots:

I asked our team to pause for family time this week before kids return to school. The homepage is updated daily. The Digest returns on Monday, August 2. —Mark Alexander

Thomas Gallatin / Apr. 24, 2020

HHS Doc Dubiously Claims Firing Over Objection to Hydroxychloroquine

He seemingly aims to exploit the Leftmedia’s anti-Trump bias to spin a false narrative in his favor.

The former head of the Department of Health and Human Services’ Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Dr. Rick Bright, is suing the Trump administration, claiming that his recent demotion was due to having “resisted efforts to provide an unproven drug on demand to the American people.” The drug in question is hydroxychloroquine, the anti-malarial drug President Donald Trump has often named as a possible treatment for COVID-19.

Bright was transferred to a lesser post at the National Institutes of Health, a transfer he says “was in response to my insistence that the government invest the billions of dollars allocated by Congress to address the COVID-19 pandemic into safe and scientifically vetted solutions, and not in drugs, vaccines and other technologies that lack scientific merit.” Got that? It’s all about science. “I am speaking out,” he went on, “because to combat this deadly virus, science — not politics or cronyism — has to lead the way.” He further insisted, “To this point, I have led the government’s efforts to invest in the best science available to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, this resulted in clashes with HHS political leadership, including criticism for my proactive efforts to invest early in vaccines and supplies critical to saving American lives. I also resisted efforts to fund potentially dangerous drugs promoted by those with political connections.”

Bright’s claim that his lawsuit isn’t politically motivated doesn’t pass the giggle test. For one thing, he procured two of DC’s most notorious anti-Trump lawyers, Debra Katz and Lisa Banks. If those names don’t ring a bell, they represented Christine Blasey Ford in her dubious and completely unsupported allegations against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Meanwhile, an HHS official familiar with the situation noted that “if Bright opposed hydroxychloroquine, he certainly didn’t make that clear from his email — quite the opposite.” In fact, Politico reports, “Three people with knowledge of HHS’ recent acquisition of tens of millions of doses of those drugs said that Bright had supported those acquisitions in internal communications, with one official saying that Bright praised the move as a win for the health department as part of an email exchange that was first reported by Reuters last week, although Bright’s message was not publicly reported.” Far from objecting to the drug, HHS spokeswoman Caitlin Oakley told Politico: “As it relates to chloroquine, it was Dr. Bright who requested an Emergency Use Authorization from the Food and Drug Administration for donations of chloroquine that Bayer and Sandoz recently made to the Strategic National Stockpile for use on COVID-19 patients. The [Emergency Use Authorization] is what made the donated product available for use in combating COVID-19.”

Indeed, it appears the actual reason for Bright’s removal had nothing to do with hydroxychloroquine and everything to do with job performance. HHS sources claim that the decision to remove him from BARDA leadership was initiated over a year ago. The Washington Post reports that Bright “repeatedly clashed with his boss, Robert Kadlec, the assistant HHS secretary for preparedness and response,” and one official said his departure “had been discussed by agency officials before the pandemic due to dissatisfaction with his job performance.”

The Leftmedia, which fell for this doc’s dubious story, might not have if it had actually engaged in legitimate investigative journalism instead of playing a “gotcha” game with Trump. Far from being a heroic “whistleblower,” Bright appears to have used the Leftmedia’s animosity toward Trump to spin a false narrative — a narrative that it was all too eager to propagate.

Start a conversation using these share links:

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!

★ PUBLIUS ★

“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2021 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.