Patriots: For over 25 years, your generosity has made it possible to offer The Patriot Post without a subscription fee to military personnel, students, and those with limited means. Please support the 2021 Year-End Campaign today.

Terence Jeffrey / August 21, 2019

The Apocalyptic Anti-Human Vision That Inspired Title X

Can you guess which future president expressed these views in 1970?

Can you guess which future president expressed these views in 1970?

“No one can honestly say how many people this earth of ours, with its finite resources, can accommodate,” he said. “But, it seems to me a fair judgement to say that the present rates of population growth and demand for resources have proved too rapid for our technology to improve the quality of life that we in America expect for all our citizens.”

“We, in America, have our own population problems and the time for facing up to these problems is now,” he said. “Our cities are decaying, too many American lack proper food and nutrition, our transportation facilities are failing to meet the demands of urbanization, and as we crank up our technology to solve these problems we unwittingly despoil our air, water, land, and oceans.”

“We do need more public awareness that a national goal to stabilize our population is desirable, that a two-child family is a worthwhile consideration for all American parents offering benefits to both the family and the society as a whole,” he said.

“By the end of this decade,” he said, “family planning and birth control should be as important to every parent as the family budget.”

So said then-Rep. George H.W. Bush (R.-Texas) in a speech delivered on the House floor on July 8, 1970.

Bush had chaired a group called the “Republican Task Force on Human Resources and Population.” He published its report in the Congressional Record.

One section dealt specifically with what it perceived as the population problem.

“The paramount question deals with an optimum human population,” it said. “How many people is too many people in relation to available resources? No one seems to honestly know but many believe that our current environmental problems indicate that the optimum level has been surpassed. A fair analysis would seem to be that our population and consumption rates have grown more rapidly than our ability to develop and supply the resources being consumed while protecting our environment.”

What solution did the task force foresee?

“The Task Force is committed to the development of a national population policy,” said its report. “We believe education, family planning services, contraceptive research and development as well as transportation, and community planning and development should be important components of such a policy.”

If science was being harnessed to stop people from dying, they argued, why not use it to stop people from being born?

“Death tolls have been reduced in every country to negligible rates from epidemics and disease such as malaria, measles, small-pox, cholera, polio, and tuberculosis; major advances have been made against heart disease and cancer, artificial organs can now prolong life,” said the report.

“Since we accept these intrusions into nature’s control of population as morally justified, are we not unwise to consider birth control with equal moral justification?” it said.

“If we continue to support government activities to reduce disease and improve health in order to prolong life under the auspices of what is good for society,” it said, “then should we not consider birth control as a government activity for similar reasons?”

Four months later, Bush was back on the House floor to promote his bill that created the Title X program to federally fund contraception.

“Congress had, at last, begun to recognize that population is a problem that must be reckoned with,” Bush said.

Two other Republicans who served on Bush’s task force emphasized this point.

“Estimates have been made by reliable authorities that by the year 2000 our population in the United States will reach 300 million,” said Rep. Tim Lee Carter, R.-Ky.

“It is entirely possible,” Carter said, “that productivity in a nation even as wealthy as ours may not rise sufficiently to properly feed, clothe, and care for this gigantic increase. The quality of life could well be diminished.”

Rep. Frank Horton, R.-N.Y., pointed to what he called the “impending disaster.”

“Through our research and the testimony of experts who have appeared at our hearings, the members of the task force have been convinced of the monumental and devastating effects of our current rate of population growth,” said Horton.

“In the light of this impending disaster, and the knowledge of many unwanted pregnancies, the need for better family planning services is acutely obvious,” he said.

Forty-nine years have passed since Congress enacted Bush’s “family planning” law.

In 1970, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 10.7 percent of the babies born in the United States were born to unmarried mothers. In 2017, it was 39.8 percent.

Did “family planning” improve?

In the 1970 census, the U.S. population was 203,302,031. Currently, according to the Census Bureau’s estimate, it is 329,474,092 — or about 62 percent more than it was when Congress enacted the family planning law.

In the second quarter of 1970, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the gross domestic product was $4.9436 trillion in constant 2012 dollars. By the second quarter of 2019, it had grown to $19.0238 trillion in constant 2012 dollars.

In the second quarter of 1970, that GDP equaled $24,316.53 per capita in constant 2012 dollars. In 2019, it equaled $57,739.89.

An America with more people is creating more wealth per person.


Start a conversation using these share links:

Who We Are

The Patriot Post is a highly acclaimed weekday digest of news analysis, policy and opinion written from the heartland — as opposed to the MSM’s ubiquitous Beltway echo chambers — for grassroots leaders nationwide. More

What We Offer

On the Web

We provide solid conservative perspective on the most important issues, including analysis, opinion columns, headline summaries, memes, cartoons and much more.

Via Email

Choose our full-length Digest or our quick-reading Snapshot for a summary of important news. We also offer Cartoons & Memes on Monday and Alexander’s column on Wednesday.

Our Mission

The Patriot Post is steadfast in our mission to extend the endowment of Liberty to the next generation by advocating for individual rights and responsibilities, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and promoting free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values. We are a rock-solid conservative touchstone for the expanding ranks of grassroots Americans Patriots from all walks of life. Our mission and operation budgets are not financed by any political or special interest groups, and to protect our editorial integrity, we accept no advertising. We are sustained solely by you. Please support The Patriot Fund today!


“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!” —George Washington

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2021 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

The Patriot Post does not support Internet Explorer. We recommend installing the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, or Google Chrome.