Barr Got Trumped — More Trump Social-Media Fails
President Trump should take AG Barr's social-media advice — cease and desist.
Shortly after Donald Trump took office in 2017, we noted that while most of the social-media comments he and his media team post are politically calculated, even when caustic, some of those posts are net losers that undermine his agenda.
This week, in what amounts to unfortunate timing — but an entirely avoidable error — at 0145 Tuesday morning, Trump (or one of his social-media minions) posted the following statement about the sentencing of Roger Stone: “This is a horrible and very unfair situation. The real crimes were on the other side, as nothing happens to them. Cannot allow this miscarriage of justice!”
That statement was correct. And Trump has rightly argued about sentencing before, especially in regard to those who have been caught up in dragnets because he and his administration have clearly been the targets of unjust investigations seeded by deep-state actors.
Unfortunately, though his complaint was justified, there is no justification for posting it. And once again, after the administration’s best week on record, Trump has unwittingly derailed some of that momentum with an unforced error.
For the record, here are the highlights from last week: On Monday, Gallup reported that Americans are very optimistic about our country. Tuesday, the president delivered an outstanding State of the Union Address to Congress. Wednesday, he was acquitted on both articles of impeachment, dispensing with the Democrats’ impeachment charade. Thursday, Democrats were in full panic mode about Bernie Sanders and Trump’s increased prospects for reelection. Friday, the administration’s week ended with a stellar jobs report.
But the careless social-media post about Stone has diverted attention from that great week just past.
As it turns out, Attorney General William Barr, the administration’s strongest right-thinking advocate for Rule of Law, had already determined days before Trump’s criticism, that he would seek a review of Stone’s sentencing after his conviction for lying to investigators and obstructing Congress. According to The Wall Street Journal, “Senior Justice officials had concluded on their own that the sentence recommendation was excessive and had decided to rescind it before Mr. Trump’s tweet.”
Then came Trump’s most egregious error in this matter: After becoming aware of Barr’s plan, he doubled down on his assertion about Stone’s sentencing. Trump has the power to pardon Stone, commute his sentence, etc. He should have let this play out and get out of Barr’s way.
In effect, Trump unintentionally set up Barr for claims of collusion and corruption, and left Barr in between a rock and hard place. As Barr noted: “Once [Trump’s comment posted], the question is, now what do I do? Do you go forward with what you think is the right decision or do you pull back?”
Predictably, Democrat Party leaders and their Leftmedia publicists immediately claimed that Trump and Barr were colluding on the Stone sentencing. They demanded the resignation or (yes) impeachment of Attorney General Barr. For his part, Barr confirmed that he “never” discussed the Stone case with Trump or the White House.
Further, Barr rightly rebuked Trump for his carelessnesses: “I think it’s time to stop the tweeting about Department of Justice criminal cases. I’m not going to be bullied or influenced by anybody … whether it’s Congress, a newspaper editorial board, or the president. I’m gonna do what I think is right, and you know, to have public statements … made about the department, about our people in the department, our men and women here, about cases pending in the department, and about judges before whom we have cases, make it impossible for me to do my job and to assure the courts and the prosecutors in the department that we’re doing our work with integrity. I cannot do my job here at the department with a constant background commentary that undercuts me.”
Sen. Mitch McConnell backed Barr: “The attorney general has said it’s making it difficult for him to do his job. I think the president ought to listen to the attorney general. … The president made a wise selection in picking Bill Barr. I think he ought to listen to him. … I think the attorney general knows what he is talking about. … I think he’s told the president this is not helpful, making it difficult for him to do his job. I think the president ought to listen to him.”
Trump ally Devin Nunes (R-CA) offered these observations: “I think what the attorney general said was very clear, that the president should be careful making comments about criminal investigations. The attorney general didn’t say to stop tweeting because the fact of the matter is this: With 90% of the media being hard Left and really just working for the Democratic Party, the president has to be able to tweet. He’s built a powerful tool reaching millions of Americans, millions of people around the globe, so the president has to tweet.”
Trump’s impeachment defense team attorney, Robert Ray, reiterated, “The attorney general [sent] a strong message that when you have sensitive matters like a sentencing before a court where someone’s liberty is at stake, it’s important that the executive branch speak with one voice. I think that the president’s [comments] under the circumstances complicated things and are better left for a time that is not so sensitive.”
Responding on Trump’s behalf, White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham insisted Trump “wasn’t bothered by [Barr’s] comments at all and he has the right, just like any American citizen, to publicly offer his opinions.” She added, “President Trump uses social media very effectively. … The president has full faith and confidence in Attorney General Barr to do his job and uphold the law.”
Memo to Stephanie: Nobody is questioning the president’s “right” to post social media comments. We question the wisdom and timing of those posts. Many of the posts attributed to Trump do advance his agenda. However, this was not an example of “using social media very effectively.” This was an example of using social media very carelessly.
Trump has not taken the Leftmedia bait to criticize Barr, confessing: “I do make his job harder, yes, I do agree with that. I think that’s true. He’s a very straight shooter. We have a great attorney general and he’s working very hard.”
Moving forward, the real test of whether President Trump is capable of teachability will be if he takes Barr’s advice, as indeed he should — a cease and desist regarding pointless distractions from his administration’s extraordinary successes and future agenda. Hopefully, having been challenged by Barr, he will not be so “bothered” that he insults Barr, as he has with other former administration officials who have been loyal to him and their oaths “to support and defend” our Constitution.
An indication that maybe Trump is heeding Barr’s message…
The report by DoJ IG, Michael Horowitz, clearly detailed how McCabe, a well-documented Trump hater, lied to investigators. So why was he not prosecuted? Perhaps McCabe cut a deal with prosecutor John Durham, who has yet to release his criminal investigation report, but we will likely never know.
But, as of this writing, Trump’s social media feeds have been running silent on McCabe.
However, while he may have declared a temporary cease fire with Barr, unfortunately, Trump opened fire on his former Chief of Staff, retired Marine Corps Gen. John Kelly. As a reference point, earlier this week in my column regarding the implosion of anti-Trump elitist Jonah Goldberg, I wrote, “I don’t disagree with all of Goldberg’s criticism of Trump — particularly in regards to his disrespectful if not outright disgraceful social-media posts regarding former administration officials, most notably Marine Gen. James Mattis and Gen. John Kelly.”
This from Trump today: “When I terminated John Kelly, which I couldn’t do fast enough, he knew full well that he was way over his head. Being Chief of Staff just wasn’t for him. He came in with a bang, went out with a whimper, but like so many X’s, he misses the action and just can’t keep his mouth shut, which he actually has a military and legal obligation to do. His incredible wife, Karen, who I have a lot of respect for, once pulled me aside & said strongly that ‘John respects you greatly. When we are no longer here, he will only speak well of you.’ Wrong!”
This grossly inaccurate condemnation of Gen. Kelly cannot pass without appropriate rebuke and rebuttal.
Trump was angry because at a college Q and A, Gen. Kelly noted that former NSC staffer Alexander Vindman, who was first to raise objection to Trump’s Ukraine call referencing the Biden’s, “did exactly what we teach them to do from cradle to grave – he went and told his boss what he just heard.” Kelly added in general, “We teach them, ‘Don’t follow an illegal order. And if you’re ever given one, you’ll raise it to whoever gives it to you that this is an illegal order, and then tell your boss.’”
Of course, there was no illegal order in this call, and Vindman did a lot more than tell his superiors. He willfully violated chain-of-command protocol, choosing to put his own anti-Trump political agenda first. It was likely that Vindman illegally provided the transcript of Trump’s Ukraine call to Schiff’s Demo deep-state CIA operative, another anti-Trump crusader, Eric Ciaramella.
But Gen. Kelly was not addressing those issues, and Trump’s characterization of Kelly was both libelously inaccurate and unwarranted.
For the record, John Kelly was an enlisted combat Marine who rose to the highest rank of four-star general in service to our nation. After his military career, Trump asked him to join his administration as Secretary of Homeland Security and he excelled in that Cabinet position. Trump then asked him to be his Chief of Staff, and Gen. Kelly was remarkably loyal to Trump, holding his fragmented White House together from July 2017 to January 2019 – despite Trump’s constant self-inflicted wounds and fratricidal assaults. John and Karen Kelly, who have been married since 1976 and whose Marine son was killed in Afghanistan in 2011, are people of extraordinary character. They are in a class of humble American Patriots that Trump is incapable of comprehending.
No president with a modicum of decency and respect for those who have sacrificed so much for our nation, would use his platform and bullhorn to make such a statement. Nor would they drag a spouse into this pathetic defamation of her husband, as Trump did. Trump should recall that even his own wife has asked him to stop the asinine social media rants. This one was inexcusable, and of course, there will be no apology. There never is because that would require the aforementioned modicum of decency and respect.
Finally, I was joined in my condemnation of Trump’s cavalier shot at Barr and the DoJ, and his ugly cheap shot at Gen. Kelly, by conservative commentator Ben Shapiro. He noted “the Democrats are imploding,” but Trump is diverting attention from their debacle and his administration’s winning record, with his absurd social media rants. We both agree that the difference between a “Trump supporter” and a “Trump sycophant” is that a Trump supporter is able to discern Trump’s faults… If your response to this criticism of Trump is to assail the messenger, then get a dictionary and look up the word “sycophant.”
Again, I am not questioning the president’s “right” to post social media comments. I am question the wisdom and timing of those posts, particularly in regard to this disgraceful post regarding Gen. John Kelly, and other Patriots. There is no constituent benefit for such posts, and even if there was, that would not be justification.
Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis
Pro Deo et Libertate — 1776
Join us in prayer for our Patriots in uniform and their families — Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen — standing in harm’s way, and for our nation’s First Responders. We also ask prayer for your Patriot team, that our mission would seed and encourage the Spirit of Liberty in the hearts and minds of our countrymen.